Received April 25, 2017
Accepted June 25, 2017

Objective:The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether the freeze-all strategy(Freeze/All-ET) could bring about improvements in the clinical assisted reproductive technique(ART) outcomes when compared with fresh embryo transfer strategy(Fresh-ET) in patients undergoing an ART cycle in accordance with the mean number of oocytes collected. Methods:A systematic review based on electronic searches in databases(PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was carried out to identify randomized controlled trails(RCTs) comparing ART outcomes between fresh-embryo transfers versus elective frozen-embryo transfers up to February of 2017. Four reviewers independently evaluated abstracts, validity assessment and data extraction. Odds Ratio (OR) values with a 95% confidence interval(CI), and heterogeneity were evaluated. Results:Five RCTs were included as targets for data extraction and meta-analysis purposes. The results of this meta-analysis were divided into two parts(Freeze/All-ET versus Fresh-ET): Part I- All trials in which the mean number of collected oocytes was >12 and <21 for ongoing pregnancy rate (OR=1.24; 95%CI=1.06-1.44), clinical pregnancy rate(OR=1.19;95%CI=0.98-1.43), live birth rate(OR= 1.39;95%CI=0.99-1.95), and miscarriage rate (OR=0.68; 95%CI=0.46-1.00); Part II- Three studies where the mean number of oocyte retrieved was >12 and <15 for ongoing pregnancy rate (OR=1.17; 95%CI=1.00-1.38), clinical pregnancy rate (OR=1.34; 95%CI=0.79-2.28), live birth rate (OR= 1.24; 95%CI=1.00-1.55), and miscarriage rate (RR=0.68; 95%CI=0.46-1.02). Conclusions:The freeze-all strategy could be favorable when high numbers of oocytes are collected, signaling an association between higher ovarian stimulation and consequent impairment of endometrial receptivity. However, when the mean number of oocytes collected is <15, the freeze-all strategy does not appear to be advantageous.