JBRA Assisted Reproduction 2014;18(1):7-11
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20140085

Comparative analysis of two cryopreservation systems of ovarian tissues in female Wistar rats

Isabel C. L. O. Durli1,2, Ana Helena R. Paz2, Paula B. Terraciano1,2, Eduardo P. Passos2,3, Elizabeth O. Cirne-Lima1,2

1Graduate Program in Veterinary Sciences – School of Veterinary – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) – Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
2Laboratory of Embryology and Cellular Differentiation – Experimental Research Center – Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre – Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
3Graduate Program in Medical Sciences – Faculdade de Medicina, UFRGS – Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

The study was presented on the 13th International Symposium for Immunology of Reproduction, 22-24 June, 2012, Varna, Bulgaria

Received January 21, 2014
Accepted February 20, 2014

Corresponding author:
Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima
Experimental Research Center
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
R. Ramiro Barcelos, 2350
90035-003 - Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
E-mail: ecirnelima@gmail.com

ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the most efficient protocol for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue using the automatic Freeze Control® system and to test two different cooling curves combined with two different cryoprotectants: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and ethylene glycol (EG).
Methods: In this study, 20 female Wistar rats underwent bilateral oophorectomy. The ovaries were divided into two groups: one cryopreserved in 1.5M DMSO and the other in 1.5M EG. Two cooling curves, slow (1h 50min) and rapid (35min) were analyzed. Tissue samples were frozen, thawed, fixed, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to analyze oocyte integrity. Follicular analysis was performed under optical microscopy (400x magnification) and preantral follicles were classified as primordial or primary according to developmental stage. ANOVA was performed, and Tukey’s test was used for comparison between means, with P<0.05 defined as significant.
Results: In cryopreserved tissue, the follicles with preserved integrity in each ovary were 79% primordial and 29% primary. In non-frozen (control) tissue, all follicular types were observed (primordial, primary, secondary, preantral, and antral). Reversible changes included cytoplasmic vacuolization and irregular cell outline. Irreversible changes included pyknosis. EG was more efficient than DMSO, preserving a greater number of viable primordial and primary follicles. Comparison of both cooling curves revealed no statistically significant differences between them.
Conclusion: The EG is more effective as a cryoprotectant than DMSO for obtaining higher viable numbers of primordial and primary follicles from rat ovarian tissue. Further studies are needed to demonstrate ovarian functionality, such as detection of hormone levels.

Keywords: cryopreservation, dimethyl sulfoxide, ethylene glycol, ovarian follicle.

INTRODUCTION
The survival rates of patients undergoing cancer treatment have been rising in recent years (Schuffner et al., 2004). However, surgical or clinical treatment modalities, including chemotherapy and radiation therapy, can impair fertility. Childhood cancer accounts for 1% of malignancies. Because of advances in major treatment, nearly 80% of children and adolescents who receive a diagnosis of cancer can now expect long-term survival (Binart & Sauvat, 2011, Donnez & Dolmans, 2013).

In an attempt to minimize the negative side-effects of cancer treatment, cryopreservation of ovarian tissue has arisen as a promising technique for fertility preservation in young women (Courbiere et al., 2005, Ernst et al., 2010). Cancer treatments affect germ cells, which are highly susceptible to toxicity, to different extents; their main fertility-related complication is premature ovarian failure (Almodin et al., 2004, Aubard et al., 1996, Martinez-Madrid et al., 2004).

Currently available methods of oocyte preservation still leave much to be desired; use of frozen oocytes is associated with very low pregnancy rates (Mazur et al., 1972, Porcu et al., 1997, Trounson & Kirby, 1989, Vincent et al., 1990). Therefore, advances in assisted reproductive technology have created new possibilities for the prevention and treatment of infertility. Among these methods, ovarian tissue cryopreservation appears to be the most promising—and, perhaps, the only one feasible for prepubertal use, with encouraging results (Binart & Sauvat, 2011).

Although the exact number of women who have received autotransplantation of preserved ovarian tissue worldwide is unknown, this procedure has led to 13 reported live births of healthy infants (Donnez et al., 2011).

These encouraging findings notwithstanding, human ovarian cortex transplantation still carries major limitations. One substantial concern is the possibility of transferring malignant cells back into the patient. Indeed, as ovarian biopsy and cryopreservation is performed before administration of radiation or chemotherapy, there is a risk of ovarian involvement and subsequent reintroduction of the malignancy after autotransplantation. In a retrospective Japanese study performed on autopsy samples, 22.4% of female cancer patients under the age of 40 had ovarian metastases (Kyono et al., 2010). More recently, the safety of autotransplantation of ovarian tissue in patients with ovarian tumors was investigated using xenotransplantation into SCID mice. After 24 weeks, there were no gross or microscopic signs of malignancy (Lotz et al., 2011). Hence, research interest is now focused on the banking of immature germ cells (Donnez et al., 2004, Gosden, 2000, Schroeder & Eppig, 1989).

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation provides the possibility of preserving not only reproductive function but also endogenous sex steroid production, thus eliminating the need for later hormone replacement therapy and improving long-term quality of life in this population (Rosa e Silva, 2006).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals
The study sample comprised 20 female Wistar rats, approximately 8–12 weeks old. The rat animal model was selected due to the gross similarity between the reproductive systems of human beings and other vertebrates (Mahajan, 1988). In the ovary, the biochemical and physiologic processes are similar in the formation of germ cells, the development of primordial follicles, their subsequent growth to Graafian follicles, eventual ovulation, and anatomic structure.

Although the rat is a polytocous rodent, the female has a rapid regular ovarian cyclicity of 4 to 5 days, making it a good model for studying histologic changes during cryopreservation. Animals were kept on a 12-hour light/dark cycle with a controlled temperature of 22±2°C and were provided food (standard rat chow) and water ad libitum, in accordance with Brazilian National Health Council Resolution 196/96. Bilateral oophorectomy was performed immediately after euthanizing by CO2 inhalation.

All procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (NIH publication no 80-23, revised 1996), in accordance with Biosafety Brazilian Law N° 11.794, 2008 and with prior approval of the local Animal Research Ethics Committee (CEUA/HCPA) under the number GPPG 10-0255.

Ovary collection
After bilateral oophorectomy, ovaries were bisected, rinsed with PBS to remove excess blood, and placed in human tubal fluid (HTF) embryo culture medium for 2 min.

Next, part of the material was placed in 400 µL of 1.5 M DMSO in HTF and the remaining material was placed in in 400 µL of 1,5 M EG in HTF for 15 min at room temperature.

Control group ovaries were merely rinsed with PBS to remove excess blood and placed in 10% buffered formalin.

Cryopreservation
After incubation with DMSO or EG in cryovials, tissue fragments were placed in a Freeze Control® automatic, controlled-rate cryopreservation system, alternately set to one of two cooling curves: curve 1, a slow curve (1 h 50 min), and curve 2, a rapid curve (35 min). Both curves were set to a temperature range of 20°C to –45°C. Each fresh ovary was subdivided into four fragments.

Each sample was submitted to one of the cryoprotectants (DMSO or EG) and cryopreserved under two different freezing conditions, denominated as curve 1 or curve 2. Frozen samples were then placed directly in liquid nitrogen at –196°C.

Recovery
Specimens were thawed 60 days after freezing. After removal from the liquid nitrogen bath, specimens were kept at room temperature for 2 min, placed in a 37°C ice water bath for 2 min to melt, and then rinsed with HTF to remove the freezing solution. Immediately afterwards, specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin at room temperature for over 6 h before paraffin embedding.

Follicle analysis
Histological analyses were performed with hematoxylin & eosin-stained, 4-µm-sliced, paraffin-embedded samples. Follicles were assessed by light microscopy (400x magnification) and classified according to the modified Oktay et al. (1995) criteria.

In this classification scheme, preantral follicles are classified as follows according to developmental stage: primordial, when exhibiting one layer of sparse, rectangular (flat) pre-granulosa cells surrounding the oocyte; or primary, when exhibiting at least one layer of cuboid or columnar pre-granulosa cells, until the oocyte is encapsulated by a single layer of cuboid granulosa cells.

Follicles were examined and classified as preserved or not preserved.

Follicles with cytoplasmic vacuolization or an irregular cell outline were still classified as preserved, as these changes are considered reversible.

Conversely, follicles exhibiting pyknosis were considered damaged. To evaluate ovarian functionality, primordial and primary follicles were counted in the total area of each ovarian slice.

Statistical analysis
The effects of cryopreservation on follicular integrity were assessed by ANOVA. Tukey’s test was used for comparison between means. The significance level was set at 5% (P<0.05) for all analyses.

RESULTS
In hematoxylin & eosin-stained sections corresponding to the control group (non-frozen tissue), all follicle types were present (primordial, primary, secondary, preantral, and antral), whereas only primordial and primary follicles were present in cryopreserved sections (Figure 1A).

The most frequent morphological changes in cryopreserved tissue were cytoplasmic vacuolization and irregular cell outline (Figure 1B).

In cryopreserved tissue, the follicles with preserved integrity in each ovary were 79% primordial and 29% primary. Microscopy analysis of cryopreserved ovarian tissue after thawing showed that use of EG as a freezing solution leads to a greater number of viable primordial and primary folicles on recovery compared to DMSO (P<0.05).

Figure 1

Figure 2

Comparison of tissues exposed to the two different cooling curves (slow versus rapid freezing) revealed no statistically significant differences in the number of viable primordial and primary follicles (P>0.05) (Figure 2).

DISCUSSION
Several studies have focused on improving techniques for cryopreservation of reproductive tissue, with particular emphasis on preserving the integrity of ovarian tissue. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects of freezing solutions with two different cryoprotectants (EG and DMSO) combined with two different cooling curves, one rapid and one slow, on an automated cryopreservation system.

Efficiency in ovarian tissue cryopreservation was defined as the number of preserved primordial and primary ovarian follicles, which are potentially capable of embryo generation after in vitro fertilization if adequate conditions are met. In this study, a greater number of viable primordial and primary follicles were recoverable from tissue preserved with the EG-based freezing solution, regardless of which cooling curve was used during cryopreservation. This result was most likely due to the lower embryonic cell toxicity and higher cell membrane permeability of EG (Miyamoto & Ishibashi, 1978).

Lucci et al. (2004) compared cryopreservation of four different cryoprotectants (PROH, GLY, DMSO, EG) at different strengths in Bos indicus ovarian tissue. More effective outcomes were obtained with DMSO- and PROH-based freezing solutions, which preserved the structural integrity of somatic and germ cells alike. This divergence from the results of the present study may have been due to interspecies differences in ovarian tissue; perhaps bovine follicles are more sensitive to the toxic effects of EG than those of other species. In prior studies, EG was shown to be nontoxic to human (Chi et al., 2002) and bovine embryos (Sommerfeld & Niemann, 1999, Visintin et al., 2002). Furthermore, use of EG was shown to be more effective in the cryopreservation of murine ovarian tissue, with 88% of follicles remaining morphologically normal after thaw (Candy et al., 1997); however, the authors warned that prolonged exposure to EG might decrease follicular viability. In another study of human ovarian tissue, 84% of follicles survived after cryopreservation in EG (Newton et al., 1996). These findings are consistent with the results of the present experiment: EG was found to be less toxic as a freezing solution, as shown by its superior preservation of the structural integrity of ovarian tissues. However, Candy et al. (1997) noted that prolonged exposure of rat ovaries to EG prior to freezing may lead to follicular toxicity due to the high cell membrane permeability of EG. Lucci et al. (2004) reported that, overall, the phase of follicle development (primordial, primary, or secondary) did not influence follicular resistance to cryoprotectants.

There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy of the cooling curves used in this study. This result indicates that, for conventional freezing, the conventional freezing process can be shortened without damaging cryopreserved tissue.

Several authors have proposed slow cooling techniques, as ovarian tissue is highly tolerant to the cryopreservation process (Gosden, 2000, Hovatta et al., 1996, Newton et al., 1996). Most studies have compared conventional freezing with vitrification. Isachenko et al. (2009) tested vitrification versus conventional freezing of human ovarian tissue and concluded that conventional freezing is the more promising technique, as tissue thus preserved conserves a higher development potential.

The authors believe this may be due to contamination of liquid nitrogen, which is used in freezing and storage and is susceptible to microbial contamination (Bielanski et al., 2000, Tedder et al., 1995). In a recent study, good results were obtained with the vitrification protocol previously described by Kagawa et al. (2009) and Silber (2012) in combination with the metallic grid vitrification technique (Herraiz et al. 2014). Using immunohistochemical analysis with Ki-67, Ceschin et al. (2006) concluded that although both conventional freezing and vitrification were feasible methods for ovarian tissue cryopreservation, vitrification was associated with the recovery of a greater number of potentially viable primordial follicles in rats.

Overall, a good cell freezing protocol is one that ensures the stability of cross-reactions between molecules in the intracellular environment and enables cell survival after thawing. Viable tissues should not only permit cell survival but also exhibit similar baseline architectures, including cell junctions, interactions, and molecular bonds (Jones & Darville, 1989). Cryobiology studies have shown that different types of cells exhibit different thawing behaviors even when stored in the same freezing solution. Due to the high complexity of ovarian cell architecture, survival of cryopreserved tissue depends not only on freezing and thawing curves but also on the method used for removal of cryoprotectants (Jones & Darville, 1989).

CONCLUSION
In this study, regardless of the cooling curve, EG was superior to DMSO as a cryoprotectant for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue in the Wistar rat, as it was associated with a greater number of potentially viable primordial and primary follicles on histological analysis. As there was no significant difference between cooling curves, after histological evaluation one may conclude that conventional rapid freezing protocols produced a superior number of viable primordial and primary follicles obtained from rat cryopreserved ovary tissues.

Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank FIPE HCPA for funding this project.

REFERENCES
Almodin CG, Minguetti-Camara VC, Meister H, Ceschin AP, Kriger E, Ferreira JO. Recovery of natural fertility after grafting of cryopreserved germinative tissue in ewes subjected to radiotherapy. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:160-4.
Medline Crossref

Aubard Y, Lavignac C, Grandjean MH, Piver P, Teissier MP. [Orthotopic autografts of ovarian slices in pregnant rats]. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1996;24:852-5.
Medline

Bielanski A, Nadin-Davis S, Sapp T, Lutze-Wallace C. Viral contamination of embryos cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology. 2000;40:110-6.
Medline Crossref

Binart N, Sauvat F. [Cryopreserved ovaries: models of experimental grafting]. Biol Aujourdhui. 2011;205:235-43.
Medline

Candy CJ, Wood MJ, Whittingham DG. Effect of cryoprotectants on the survival of follicles in frozen mouse ovaries. J Reprod Fertil. 1997;110:11-9.
Medline Crossref

Ceschin AP, Malafaia O, Thomaz BAC, Oliveira LM, Almodin CG, Ioshii SO, Dori A, Cavalcanti TCS. [Ki-67 marker used as a predictive index of the viability of cryopreserved ovaries through slow freezing and vitrification in rats]. Rev Med Paraná. 2006;64:34-8.

Chi HJ, Koo JJ, Kim MY, Joo JY, Chang SS, Chung KS. Cryopreservation of human embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled slow freezing. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2146-51.
Medline Crossref

Courbiere B, Massardier J, Salle B, Mazoyer C, Guerin JF, Lornage J. Follicular viability and histological assessment after cryopreservation of whole sheep ovaries with vascular pedicle by vitrification. Fertil Steril. 2005;84 Suppl 2:1065-71.
Medline Crossref

Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Demylle D, Jadoul P, Pirard C, Squifflet J, Martinez-Madrid B, van Langendonckt A. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet. 2004;364:1405-10.
Medline Crossref

Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Fertility preservation in woman. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013;9:735–49.
Medline Crossref

Donnez J, Squifflet J, Jadoul P, Demylle D, Cheron AC, Van Langendonckt A, Dolmans M-M. Pregnancy and live birth after autotransplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue in a patient with metastatic disease undergoing chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1787 e1-4.
Medline Crossref

Ernst E, Bergholdt S, Jorgensen JS, Andersen CY. The first woman to give birth to two children following transplantation of frozen/thawed ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1280-1.
Medline Crossref

Gosden RG. Low temperature storage and grafting of human ovarian tissue. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000;163:125-9.
Medline Crossref

Herraiz S, Maestre EN, Rodríguez B, Díaz C, Serrano MS, Mirabet V, and Pellicer A. Improving ovarian tissue cryopreservation for oncologic patients: slow freezing versus vitrification, effect of different procedures and devices. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:775-84.
Medline Crossref

Hovatta O, Silye R, Krausz T, Abir R, Margara R, Trew G, Lass A, Wunston RML. Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue using dimethylsulphoxide and propanediol-sucrose as cryoprotectants. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1268-72.
Medline

Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Weiss JM, Todorov P, Kreienberg R. Cryobanking of human ovarian tissue for anti-cancer treatment: comparison of vitrification and conventional freezing. Cryo Letters. 2009;30:449-54.
Medline

Jones SK, Darville JM. Transmission of virus particles by cryotherapy and multi-use caustic pencils: a problem to dermatologists? Br J Dermatol. 1989;121:481-6.
Medline

Kagawa N, Silber S, Kuwayama M. Successful vitrification of bovine and human ovarian tissue. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18:568–77.
Medline

Kyono K, Doshida M, Toya M, Sato Y, Akahira J, Sasano H. Potential indications for ovarian autotransplantation based on the analysis of 5,571 autopsy findings of females under the age of 40 in Japan. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2429-30.
Medline Crossref

Lotz L, Montag M, van der Ven H, von Wolff M, Mueller A, Hoffmann I, Wachter D, Beckmann MW, Dittrich R. Xenotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue from patients with ovarian tumors into SCID mice - no evidence of malignant cell contamination. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2612-4 e1.
Medline Crossref

Lucci CM, Kacinskis MA, Lopes LH, Rumpf R, Bao SN. Effect of different cryoprotectants on the structural preservation of follicles in frozen zebu bovine (Bos indicus) ovarian tissue. Theriogenology. 2004;61:1101-14.
Medline Crossref

Mahajan DK. Polycystic ovarian disease: animal models. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1988;17:705-32.
Medline

Martinez-Madrid B, Dolmans MM, Van Langendonckt A, Defrere S, Donnez J. Freeze-thawing intact human ovary with its vascular pedicle with a passive cooling device. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:1390-4.
MedlineCrossref

Mazur P, Leibo SP, Chu EH. A two-factor hypothesis of freezing injury. Evidence from Chinese hamster tissue-culture cells. Exp Cell Res. 1972;71:345-55.
Medline

Miyamoto H, Ishibashi T. The protective action of glycols against freezing damage of mouse and rat embryos. J Reprod Fertil. 1978;54:427-32.
Medline Crossref

Newton H, Aubard Y, Rutherford A, Sharma V, Gosden R. Low temperature storage and grafting of human ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1487-91.
Medline Crossref

Oktay K, Schenken RS, Nelson JF. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen marks the initiation of follicular growth in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1995;53:295-301.
Medline Crossref

Porcu E, Fabbri R, Seracchioli R, Ciotti PM, Magrini O, Flamigni C. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:724-6.
Medline Crossref

Rosa e Silva AC. [Fertility preservation]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28:365-72.

Schroeder AC, Eppig JJ. Developmental capacity of mouse oocytes that undergo maturation in vitro: effect of the hormonal state of the oocyte donor. Gamete Res. 1989;24:81-92.
Medline

Schuffner A, Ramos L, Stockler S, Hernandes R, Costa S, Centa L. [Cryopreservation of gametes - a hope for cancer patients]. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2004;50:117-20.

Silber SJ. Ovary cryopreservation and transplantation for fertility preservation. Mol Hum Reprod 2012;18:59–67.
Medline Crossref

Sommerfeld V, Niemann H. Cryopreservation of bovine in vitro produced embryos using ethylene glycol in controlled freezing or vitrification. Cryobiology. 1999;38:95-105.
Medline Crossref

Tedder RS, Zuckerman MA, Goldstone AH, Hawkins AE, Fielding A, Briggs EM, Irwin D, Blair S, Gorman AM, Patterson KG, Linch DC, Heptonstall J, Brink NS. Hepatitis B transmission from contaminated cryopreservation tank. Lancet. 1995;346:137-40.
Medline

Trounson A, Kirby C. Problems in the cryopreservation of unfertilized eggs by slow cooling in dimethyl sulfoxide. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:778-86.
Medline

Vincent C, Pickering SJ, Johnson MH. The hardening effect of dimethylsulphoxide on the mouse zona pellucida requires the presence of an oocyte and is associated with a reduction in the number of cortical granules present. J Reprod Fertil. 1990;89:253-9.
Medline Crossref

Visintin JA, Martins JF, Bevilacqua EM, Mello MR, Nicacio AC, Assumpcao ME. Cryopreservation of Bos taurus vs Bos indicus embryos: are they really different? Theriogenology. 2002;57:345-59.
Medline