Table 1: Compared ICSI/IVF media including data here described.
Media Compared ICSI/IVF Results∕ Conclusions References
BM1 (Ellios Bio-Media) and IVF-50 (Scandinavian IVF Science) ICSI BM1 yielded embryos with superior quality Parinaud et al., 1998
P-1 (Irvine Scientific) andIVF-50 (Scandinavian IVF Science) ICSI There was no difference between the media Mauri et al., 2001
Sydney IVF (Cook, Queensland) and Quinn’s Advantage (Cooper Surgical) ICSI Culture medium Quinn’s Advantage showed better rates in embryo quality and pregnancy Hoogendijk et al., 2007
GV BLAST (Ingamed) and P-1 (Irvine Scientific) ICSI There was no difference in blastocyst and pregnancy rates between the media Lopes et al.2008
G5 (G-1 PLUS v5, Vitrolife AB, Kungsbacka.) and Global IVF (Guilford, CT) ICSI There was no difference between the media Reed et al., 2009
Sydney IVF (Cook, Queensland) and GM501 (Gynemed, Lensahn) ICSI Pregnancy rates were significantly higher with sole medium Paternot et al., 2010
GM501(Gynemed, Lensahn) and ISM1 (MediCult, Jyllinge) IVF There was a higher rate of fragmentation of embryos with medium GM501 Campo et al., 2010
Vitrolife G3 (Goteborg, Sweden) and Sydney IVF (Cook, Queensland) IVF Medium G3 had better pregnancy rates Dumoulin et al., 2010
G5 (G-1 PLUS v5, Vitrolife AB, Kungsbacka.) and Embryo Assist (Universal IVF, MediCult A / S, Jyllinge) ICSI Culture medium G5 had better blastocyst and pregnancy rates Hambiliki et al., 2011
Maria Research Center (MRC) and Sydney IVF (Cook, Queensland) IVF Medium MRC was as effective as medium Sydney IVF on embryo quality and pregnancy rates Yoon et al., 2011
Global IVF (Guilford, CT) and Quinn’sAdv (Cooper Surgical) ICSI The embryos in sole medium had higher blastocyst, pregnancy, and implantation rates Khoury et al., 2012
Global IVF (Guilford, CT) and Quinn’sAdv (Cooper Surgical) ICSI There was no difference between the media Summers et al., 2013
G-TL (Vitrolife Sweden AB) and G1/G2 (Vitrolife Sweden AB) ICSI No significant differences were found in embryo quality or pregnancy rates Hardarson et al., 2015
G1-PLUS™/G2-PLUS™ sequential (Vitrolife) and the GL BLAST™ sole (Ingamed) ICSI There was no difference between the media * Data obtained in the present study