JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2020;24(4):416-420
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200034
1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2 Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Department of Cardiology, Heshmat Hospital, School of Medicine,
Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
ABSTRACT
Objective: School-based reproductive health education programs (RHEP) motivate
adolescent girls to maintain and improve their health, and prevent diseases.
The purpose of this PAR was to design, implement and evaluate RHEP to
strengthen adolescent girl's reproductive health.
Methods: The PAR process was selected as an RHEP strategy, and it has four main
phases, including: 1) assessment to explore the reproductive health
education needs (RHEN) of adolescent girls. We collected data through
in-depth individual interviews with 11 adolescent girls (12-18 years) in
high school, 2 focus group discussions (FGD), and 4 interviews with the key
informants. 2) Intervention design involved a Delphi approach to design an
intervention that would address each need using 7 expert participants with a
background in primary health, health promotion and other youth-focused
professions. 3) In the action plan phase, the workshops, lecture meetings,
counseling, and FGD were organized by the research team. 4) The impact of
the intervention was evaluated through a mixed evaluation methodology, a
semi-structured interviews with stakeholders and key informant,
quasi-experimental assessment and FGD.
Results: There were three themes we extracted from the data: (a) the need for RHP for
adolescent girls, (b) sources of information about RH, and (c) the need to
empower teachers to provide RHEP to their students. a) Workshops, (b
Counseling, c) Lecture Meetings, d) Focus Group. The study showed that the
level of knowledge about RH in more than half of the participants was poor
and only in nearly half of them it was moderate.
Conclusion: Results suggest that Iranian adolescents do not have adequate education
regarding RH, and RHEP by PAR can be effective in improving the knowledge
and behavior of female students.
Keywords: adolescent, participatory action research, reproductive health
INTRODUCTION
The period of adolescence is a life phase in which young people are particularly
vulnerable to health risks. WHO defines 'Adolescents' as young people between the
ages of 10 and 19 years (WHO, 2017). During teenage years, sexual development and
the ability to reproduce occur, but most adolescents go through this time with only
ambiguous information on RH (Eslamimehr et
al., 2016).
Given that adolescent girls are future mothers, information about RH is important not
only to improve their health but also to prevent possible health problems (Mirzaii & Olfati, 2014). Adolescents become
vulnerable to problems due to a lack of knowledge and skills to avoid high-risk
behaviors and lack of acceptable and appropriate RH information and services (Silva, 2015). RH refers to the health and
well-being of women and men in terms of sexuality, pregnancy, birth, and their
associated conditions, diseases, and illnesses (Denno et al., 2015). In 1994, the International Conference
on Population and Development (ICPD) focused on the importance of adolescence to RH
throughout one's life span (Obong'o & Zani,
2014).
At present, the world is more interlinked than ever before, high school students all
over the globe are demanding accurate and accessible information about RH (Shakour et al., 2016). They
need not only information about bodily processes and a better understanding of
society's set of behaviors, but they also need the skills necessary to develop
healthy relationships and engage in responsible decision-making, especially during
adolescence when their emotional development accelerates (Silva, 2015; Obong'o &
Zani, 2014). These adolescents need scientific-based information to raise
their RH awareness and prevent RH-related problems (Inter-agency Working Group on
Reproductive Health in Crises, 2010). Provision of such knowledge should be
internationally regarded as one of the human rights (Silva, 2015). School-based RHEP
have the potential to be an effective and cost-effective way to reduce puberty
problems associated with education as it informs adolescents on safe behavior,
abstinence and to be more responsible in making decisions about their lives (Casey, 2015). Schools, as a learning
environment, play a vital role in the development of young people by providing
knowledge and skills, and have been recognized as an appropriate setting for health
promotion, including RH (Eslamimehr et
al., 2016).
In addition to be a setting where adolescents spend most of their time, schools have
the infrastructure in place for health activities, serving as a link between young
people and their local communities (Silva,
2015). Therefore, governments and other stakeholders have the
responsibility of developing programs that provide adolescents with accurate
information to enable them to have desirable control over issues pertaining to RH
(Casey, 2015). In addition, these should
seek to provide RH services that are consistent with the community's cultural and
religious values (Obong'o & Zani,
2014).
In Iran, the concept of RH has not been well understood and it is highly
controversial (Jalali Aria et al.,
2010). Because of the shame, taboos, cultural and social beliefs, an
appropriate RHEP for adolescents has been neglected in the family setting and school
(Simbar et al., 2017).
Besides, these issues are not discussed into textbooks (Jalali Aria et
al., 2010). Despite reported increases in global connections and media
coverage, Iranian youth are still facing RH problems (Shakour et al., 2016). Many adolescents lack
awareness of available services; they are also restricted from seeking RH
information and services and fear the stigma associated with seeking RH care from
formal healthcare centers (Madanipour et
al., 2009). These facts show that there is a strong need to
assess adolescent knowledge and there are plans for strategies to help them address
knowledge gaps, since risk-related behaviors among adolescents can be reduced
through raising awareness about HIV/AIDS, and related issues (Obong'o & Zani, 2014). Since meaningful girl engagement can
ensure that girls' voices are heard, their ideas are welcomed, and their knowledge
is used in developing and implementing sustainable and effective programs, research,
and policies (Nair et al.,
2012).
Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a means for school psychologists, as
participatory researchers, to provide collaborative research leadership within
schools for the development of system-wide interventions (Hawkins, 2015). A case study indicated that the PAR process
resulted in the design and implementation of a school-based research partnership
program that was culturally specific, acceptable to stakeholders. The purpose of
this participatory action research study was to design, implement and evaluate
RHEP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PAR was selected as an RHEP strategy, with a twofold goal: to develop knowledge and
effective interventions. The PAR approach, as described by Maguire (1987), provided the methodological framework for this
study (Dickson & Green, 2001).
The project lasted for approximately 2 years after the protocol was accepted and
became financially supported in September 2018. The approach had four main phases,
included in: 1) Needs assessment, 2( Intervention design, 3) Action planning, 4)
Evaluation of the intervention.
Phase 1: Needs Assessment
In this phase, we explored the reproductive health educational needs (RHEN) of
adolescent girls. Two main data collection strategies were employed in this
phase; FGD and in-depth interview. Phase one of this project was conducted using
conventional content analysis. Participants were selected through purposive
sampling. We collected the data through in-depth individual interviews with 11
adolescent girls (12-18 years) in high school, 2 FGD, and 4 interviews with the
key informants. The interview guide contained elementary questions and was
developed by researchers, and the expert researchers in the field of RH
confirmed its validity.
All interviews were recorded and transcribed. We analyzed the transcribed texts
in five steps. In the first step, the interviews are read through and listened
to several times. In the second step, we assessed meaning units related to the
aim. In the third step, the meaning units are condensed, labeled, and finally
coded based on their content. Based on the codes, subcategories and categories
are developed in the fourth step. In the fifth step, the categories were
carefully discussed and the main categories identified. We analyzed the data
using content analysis method and the MAXQDA software. To complete the RHEN
concept and dimensions, we performed an extensive review of the related
literature in Science Direct, PubMed (include in Medline), and Google Scholar,
and some Persian databases including Irandoc, and Medlib. We included studies
meeting the following criteria: Studies that explored RHEN, Published in English
and Persian language. Published qualitative, mixed methods, or quantitative
studies. The study evaluated a school-based RHE intervention delivered in Iran.
We excluded those studies in which the topic was irrelevant to RH.
Phase 2: Interventions Design
The purpose of this phase was designing need- based interventions to improve
adolescent girls' reproductive health. Need-based intervention is an effective
strategy for improving health literacy (Ramezanzadeh et al., 2010). We used a Delphi
approach to design an intervention that would address each need using
participants' suggestions. There is a lack of consensus on what represents
adequate sample size for Delphi studies. The Delphi technique is a group
communication process as well as a method for achieving opinion consensus. The
Delphi panel size does not depend on statistical power, but relies on the
dynamics of a group for arriving at a consensus with the literature recommending
10-18 experts on a Delphi panel (Shariff,
2015). Data collected in the first round of Delphi questionnaires
will be qualitative in nature and will be analyzed using content analyses
techniques (Donohoe et al.,
2012).
During this phase, the study engaged 7 expert participants with a background in
primary health, youth work, health promotion and other youth-focused activities.
We employed several measures to increase the rigor of the study. To reduce bias,
we collected the data, coded it and discussed regularly with the research team.
We managed to Increase credibility through prolonged engagement with the setting
and regular checking raw data, analyses and reports. Detailed descriptions of
the contextual data and activities of the study, through immersion, reflective
journaling and detailed documentation presented enabled others to analyze the
situation and research outcomes based on context. To reduce bias and enhance
conformability, the research team analyzed the coding and themes.
Phase 3: Action Planning
This phase involved action planning and project implementation. The goals,
policies and proposed actions detailed in the previous phase (Delphi) lead to
project implementation activities. In this phase, we developed the documents to
implement specific goals and objectives (actions) identified in the RHEP through
task development. The tasks in the action plan, establish in details how who
shall conduct the activities, when, and within what time frame and funding
authority. The stakeholders organized the workshops. The research team
(adolescence committee members) began the lecture based on the overall aim of
the training session and on the specific learning objectives. They presented a
description of what would be covered and the sequence to be followed. Materials
included handouts and briefing papers. We used flipcharts, overhead projectors,
blackboards, and video equipment. FGD was used to assess the values expressed by
participants, the range of knowledge and to identify issues in which there is
agreement or disagreement between members.
Phase 4: Intervention Assessment
This phase's aim was to evaluate the RHEP using a mixed evaluation methodology
include semi-structured interviews with stakeholders and key-informants,
quasi-experimental assessment, FGD.
The fourth phase, the implementation stage of carrying out the interventions and
the evaluation, represents one important empirical part of the RHEP. In this
phase, useful data would be pre-post evaluation tests, both summary scores for
evidence and context, narrative summary, and evaluation of facilitation
approach, according to the PAR.
Before and after the intervention, participants in both the intervention and
control groups completed a questionnaire concerning their knowledge about RH.
The researchers developed the self-administered questionnaire based on an
extensive literature review, as a tool for data collection. The questionnaire
consisted of two sections. The first section related to socio-demographic items
such as age, gender, educational level, occupational status of parents, and
monthly family income. The second section was designed to assess participants'
knowledge on RH through 18 knowledge-testing items (i.e., physical and
psychological changes during puberty, menstruation, misconception regarding
menstruation, hygiene practices during menstruation, mode of HIV transmission
and prevention). All the questions were explained to the participants and they
were asked to fill in the answers carefully. Knowledge-test questions were
multiple choice. A score of one was given to the correct answers and zero to the
wrong answers. The knowledge scores ranged from 0 to 18 with a higher score
representing better knowledge about RH. The level of knowledge was described as
good if they scored 12-18, moderate if 6-11, and poor if 0-5.
Fifteen students and 10 university experts in RH and health education determined
the quantitative face validity of the questionnaire. The face validity of the
item was calculated by using the Impact Score equation. The Content Validity
Index (CVI) and the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were computed for the whole
test. In the current study, the calculated CVI and CVR were 0.89 and 0.91,
respectively. We measured the reliability using Cronbach's alpha method, at a
value of 0.81. This result demonstrated that the questionnaire was internally
consistent.
An independent sample t-test was used for statistical analysis. The results were
expressed as frequency, mean, and standard deviation (SD) for qualitative and
quantitative data, respectively. We analyzed the data using the SPSS, version
21. A value of p<0.05 was considered statically
significant.
In order to protect the rights of the participants, the research team explained
the purpose of the study, assured participants that their information would be
private and confidential, and explained that participants could withdraw from
the study at any time. All adolescent girls who participated in the study signed
written informed consent forms.
RESULTS
Our action plan enabled us to track, measure, monitor and adjust our stakeholder
engagement efforts. Our findings in the first phase (Reproductive health education
needs of adolescent girls) pointed to three main themes: the necessity of RHEP for
adolescent girls, sources of information about RH and the need to empower teachers
to provide RHP to their students. Most participants believed in limiting RHEP for
adolescent girls; they stated that teachers are the best people to educate
adolescents about RH. Each of these included various sub-themes.
The different stakeholders arrived at a set of solutions through an iterative process
of consultation and reaching the agreement. Based on the findings of the second
phase (interventions, design), appropriate and culturally based content for
participants included reproductive anatomy, reproductive biology, menstrual hygiene,
HIV, and reproduction organ cancer prevention. In addition, we identified themes
relevant to the teaching method in this phase.
All expert panel members in the Delphi panel agreed with multilevel interventions
that included: a) Workshops, b) Counseling, c) Lecture Meetings, d) FGD.
In the third phase of this study (Action Plans), the findings clearly demonstrated
that for the successful implementation of RHEP we needed quality teaching and
participatory teaching methods that engaged students. The stakeholders planned,
organized, promoted, and conducted their separate workshops. These participants
chose the topics and selected speakers among themselves. Verbal feedback from the
attendees was positive. In addition, the written feedback indicated that FGD helped
develop a better understanding of RHEP.
According to our study's findings, the participants' awareness of RH issues was
inadequate. In the final evaluation, all methods that presented the action phase
included the workshops, lecture meetings, counseling, and FGD. They were
satisfactory, but the most effective method was FGD, from the students' point of
view.
DISCUSSION
This study used the potential of PAR as an approach to create knowledge and empower
RH among adolescent girls.
PAR provides an opportunity to bring adolescents together and share their experiences
with the aim of promoting reproductive health. Sharing experiences gave the
adolescents a sense of collective identity. Sharing these feelings assured them that
they were not alone (Frahsa et al.,
2014).
PAR managed to enable the adolescents' abilities through cooperation with others,
challenging the status quo, being creative in interaction spaces, and practicing
opportunities (Dickson & Green, 2001). On
the other hand, the ‘competition' in practice to better planning, coordinate and
implement activities cause empowers students (BeLue et al., 2012).
Overall findings revealed that participants had many unmet RHEN and PAR needs, which
are effective in improving adolescents' knowledge regarding RH issues. Adolescents
have the right to obtain accurate and sufficient information about RH to make
responsible and correct decisions regarding their RH needs (Mirzaii Najmabadi et al., 2018). There are no
explicit policies supporting the provision of RH education for them in Iranian
schools. For the successful implementation of the school-based component of this
intervention, participatory teaching methods that engage students are necessary
(Panjalipour et al.,
2018). Also, the healthcare system in Iran does not provide RH services
tailored for adolescents. In fact, many reproductive healthcare services are
provided only for married people.
The current study revealed that participants do not have enough, or correct knowledge
about RH. This problem was reported in several Iranian studies (Simbar et al., 2017; Mirzaii Najmabadi et al.,
2018; Panjalipour et al.,
2018).
Yazdi et al. (2006) revealed
that 43% of adolescents agreed that HIV/AIDS is curable if diagnosed at an early
stage, and 81% of participants said that HIV/AIDS is a vaccine-preventable-disease.
General awareness concerning the physical changes that occur during adolescence is
still poor, and this is very dangerous as they find it difficult to accommodate
those changes because they do not know their meaning (Eslamimehr et al., 2016).
Current studies revealed that a major source of participants' information about
puberty came from their friends and peers; which were unreliable. These findings are
consistent with other studies carried out in Iran (Madanipour et al., 2009; Ramezanzadeh et al., 2010).
More than half of the participants mentioned that they wanted to receive knowledge on
RH from others; this means that they want to discuss together issues associated with
reproductive health and learn from each other. Blazar
and Kraft (Blazar & Kraft, 2017) indicated that the behaviors are
developed and shared in specific groups such as peers, choir, schools, adult friends
and drama clubs. These are very important findings, which suggest that reproductive
health education to the population of this age group would be more successfully
delivered through FDG (Borawski et
al., 2015).
The study findings showed the need to enhance interaction and positive attitudes
among teachers and adolescent girls. Almost half of the participants mentioned
teachers as their source of information indicating that school is the place where
adolescents spend most of their time under the care of their teachers. Teachers can
play a great role in adolescents' behavior change because adolescents trust and
learn from them through discussions, imitation and following role modeling. Teachers
should be non-judgmental and friendly when they teach adolescents about RH (Borawski et al., 2015). This
attitude enables them to better understand the problems of adolescents and share
their RH concerns with them (Kaushal et al., 2015). A number of
studies have shown that teachers could enhance communication with adolescents by
showing empathy when interacting with them. This question-item aimed to know the
sources from which adolescents get information on reproductive health (Blazar & Kraft, 2017; Borawski et
al., 2015; Kaushal et al., 2015). Therefore, if
teachers play their role effectively in educating adolescents on RH, most of them
will be knowledgeable and have good RH.
Since PAR is systematic and rigorous, this method will enable stakeholders and
researchers to explore and discover effective solutions during the research process.
Using PAR will enable increased engagement and collaboration with the research
participants and stakeholders. Nevertheless, the current study had several
limitations. It was a qualitative study; thus, we were limited in generalizing our
results. In addition, different types of research questions are required to address
different types of research designs. Participants were only unmarried adolescent
girls in high schools; if it had included married adolescents and out-of-school
adolescent girls, it would have had outcomes that are more comprehensive.
CONCLUSIONS
In-Depth multiple studies were conducted using adolescents' needs assessment as well
as discussions with investigators about factors associated with RH promotion. This
study improved our understanding of identifying factors associated with effective
development, implementation, and evaluation of RH based on PAR.
Our results show that school-based RHP is an essential program for improving
adolescents' knowledge and it is cost-effective in the prevention of health issues.
This study showed changes among the participants through a partnership program. The
findings indicate that PAR enhances RH knowledge and it appears to be a valuable
approach in RH promotion. Despite limitations, our review indicates that RHP based
on PAR may be an effective strategy to promote adolescents' knowledge on RH.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the adolescent girls in the high school of Rasht who helped us in conducting
this study. Guilan University of Medical Sciences (project number is
IR.GUMS.REC.1396.143) supported this research.
REFERENCES
Blazar D, Kraft MA. Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students'
Attitudes and Behaviors. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2017;39:146-70. PMID: 28931959
DOI: 10.3102/0162373716670260
Medline Crossref
Borawski EA, Tufts KA, Trapl ES, Hayman LL, Yoder LD, Lovegreen LD.
Effectiveness of health education teachers and school nurses teaching sexually
transmitted infections/human immunodeficiency virus prevention knowledge and
skills in high school. J Sch Health. 2015;85:189-96. PMID: 25611941 DOI:
10.1111/josh.12234
Medline Crossref
Casey SE. Evaluations of reproductive health programs in
humanitarian settings: a systematic review. Confl Health. 2015;9:S1. PMID:
25685183 DOI: 10.1186/1752-1505-9-S1-S1
Medline Crossref
Denno DM, Hoopes AJ, Chandra-Mouli V. Effective strategies to
provide adolescent sexual and reproductive health services and to increase
demand and community support. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56:S22-41. PMID: 25528977
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.012
Medline Crossref
Dickson G, Green KL. The external researcher in participatory action
research. Educ Action Res. 2001;9:243-60. DOI:
10.1080/09650790100200150
Crossref
Donohoe H, Stellefson M, Tennant B. Advantages and Limitations of
the e-Delphi Technique. Am J Health Educ. 2012;43:38-46. DOI:
10.1080/19325037.2012.10599216
Crossref
Frahsa A, Rütten A, Roeger U, Abu-Omar K, Schow D. Enabling the
powerful? Participatory action research with local policy makers and
professionals in physical activity promotion with women in difficult life
situations. Health Promot Int. 2014;29:171-84. PMID: 22987843 DOI:
10.1093/heapro/das050
Medline Crossref
Hawkins KA. The complexities of participatory action research and
the problems of power, identity and influence. Educ Action Res. 2015;23:464-78.
DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2015.1013046
Crossref
Kaushal P, Singh T, Padda AS, Deepti SS, Bansal P, Satija M, Sharma
S, Ankita. Impact of Health Education on The Knowledge, Attitude and Practices
of Teachers Regarding Reproductive Health of Adolescents of Amritsar, Punjab. J
Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:LC18-21. PMID: 26155502 DOI:
10.7860/JCDR/2015/13583.5985
Medline Crossref
Mirzaii Najmabadi K, Babazadeh R, Mousavi SA, Shariati M. Iranian
Adolescent Girls' Challenges in Accessing Sexual and Reproductive Health
Information and Services. J Health. 2018;8:561-74. PMID: 25183530 DOI:
10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100856
Medline Crossref
Nair MK, Paul MK, Leena M, Thankachi Y, George B, Pillai HV.
Effectiveness of a reproductive sexual health education package among school
going adolescents. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79:S64-8. PMID: 21617909 DOI:
10.1007/s12098-011-0433-x
Medline Crossref
Panjalipour S, Khalesi ZB, Mirhaghjoo SN. Iranian girls Adolescents'
Reproductive Health Needs: A Systematic Review. Int J Womens Heal Reprod Sci.
2018;6:226-32. DOI: 10.15296/ijwhr.2018.39
Crossref
Shariff N. Utilizing the Delphi survey approach: A review. J Nurs
Care. 2015;4:246-51. DOI: 10.4172/2167-1168.1000246
Crossref
Yazdi CA, Aschbacher K, Arvantaj A, Naser HM, Abdollahi E, Asadi A,
Mousavi M, Narmani MR, Kianpishe M, Nicfallah F, Moghadam AK. Knowledge,
attitudes and sources of information regarding HIV/AIDS in Iranian adolescents.
AIDS Care. 2006;18:1004-10. PMID: 17012092 DOI:
10.1080/09540120500526284
Medline Crossref