| Table 2. Bias risks of the included RCT | |||||||
| Study, year | Domain1 | Domain2 | Domain3 | Domain4 | Domain5 | Domain6 | Domain7 |
| Moraloglu et al., 2010 | High | High | Low | unknown | Low | Low | unknown |
| Ng et al., 2014 | Unknown | Low | Low | unknown | Low | Low | Low |
| He et al., 2016a | Low | Low | unknown | unknown | Low | Low | Low |
| Hebisha et al., 2016 | Unknown | unknown | unknown | unknown | Low | Low | unknown |
| 1: Random sequence generation (selection bias) 2: allocation concealment (selection bias) 3: blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 4: blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) (patient-reported outcome) 5: blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) (all-cause main outcome) 6: incomplete outcome data (attrition data) 7: selective reporting (reporting bias) |
|||||||