| Table 3. Summary of the studies that combine Time lapse embryo culture and PGT-A analysis. | |||||||||
| Item | Reference | Type of study | Embryos (n) |
Patients (n) |
Embryo culture | Day transfer | Morphokinetic parameters | Statistically significant variables |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| significant difference | no significant difference | ||||||||
| Euploid vs. aneuploid | Amir et al., 2019 | cohort study | 270 | NA | Blastocyst stage | FISH | x | t4,tSB, tPNf | |
| Basile et al., 2014 | Retrospective | 504 | 125 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | t5-t2, cc3 | ||
| Bayram et al., 2012 | Prospective | 122 | 17 | Cleavage stage | FISH | x | s3 | ||
| Campbell et al., 2013 | Retrospective | 195 | 25 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | tSC,tSB, tB | ||
| Chavez et al., 2012 | Cohort studies | 53 | NA | Cleavage stage | aCGH | x | from t1 to t4 | ||
| Chawla et al., 2015 | Retrospective | 496 | 132 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | tPNf, t2, t5,cc2,cc3, t5-t2 | ||
| Davies et al., 2012 | Retrospective | 62 | NA | NA | aCGH | x | t2,t3,s2 | ||
| Del Carmen Nogales et al., 2017 | Retrospective | 485 | 112 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | t3, t5, cc2, cc3, s2, t5-t2 | ||
| Hong et al., 2013 | Prospective | 307 | 24 | Blastocyst stage | qPCR | x | tEB and from t5 to tSB | ||
| Euploid vs. aneuploid | Huang et al., 2019 | Retrospective | 188 | 34 | Cleavage stage | aCGH | x | tBE | |
| Kahraman et al., 2020 | Retrospective | 741 | 279 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9, tM, tSB, tB | ||
| Kramer et al., 2014 | Retrospective | 149 | 25 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | |||
| Melzer et al., 2013 | Prospective | tM | |||||||
| Minasi et al., 2016 | Retrospective | 928 | 454 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | t4,s2,tB, tEB, tHed | ||
| Mumusoglu et al., 2017 | Retrospective | 415 | 103 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | t9,tM,tSB,tB,tEB | ||
| Patel et al., 2016 | Retrospective | 167 | 26 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | |||
| Rienzi et al., 2015 | cohort study | 455 | 138 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | |||
| Semeniuk et al., 2013 | retrospective | 76 | NA | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | |||
| Euploid vs. aneuploid | Stevens et al., 2012 | Cohort studies | 53 | 35 | Blastocyst stage | qPCR | x | ||
| Vera-Rodriguez et al., 2015 | Prospective | 85 | NA | Cleavage stage | aCGH | x | tPNf, t2 , s2 | ||
| Yang et al., 2014 | prospective | 498 | 138 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | |||
| Zhang et al., 2017 | Retrospective | 256 | 75 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | x | |||
| Male vs. female | Bodri et al., 2016 | Retrospective | 291 | NA | Blastocyst stage | NA | X | t8,tM, tB | |
| Bronet et al., 2015 | Retrospective | 327 | 93 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | X | s2, tM | ||
| Huang & Jin, 2017 | Retrospective | 174 | 134 | NA | NA | X | t3,t4,cc2 | ||
| Huang et al., 2019 | Retrospective | 308 | 228 | Cleavage stage | NA | X | t3,t4,t5, cc2 | ||
| Male vs. female | Melzer et al., 2013 | Prospective | 213 | 20 | Blastocyst stage | aCGH | X | t4 | |
| Serdarogullari et al., 2014 | Retrospective | 177 | 139 | NA | NA | x | |||
| Zeyad et al., 2018 | cohort study | 416 | 120 | Blastocyst stage | FISH | X | tPN, tPNf | ||
Note: NA: not available; d2/3/5: day 2/3/5; FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridization; aCGH: array comparative genomic hybridization; qPCR: quantitative polymerase chain reaction; other abbreviations in Table 1.