JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2023;27(1):9-14
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210113
History of malignant neoplasia lessens oocyte developmental competence: a case-control study
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Objective: We investigated how history of malignant neoplasia affected oocyte developmental competence.
Methods: Fifty-two cycles of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in women with a history of malignant disease (case group) were compared with fifty-two matched cycles of ART in women with no cancer history (control group). Propensity score matching involving age and body mass index was used to select controls. Oocyte developmental competence and rates of pregnancy and livebirth were compared as main outcomes. To investigate whether the cancer itself had affected oocyte developmental competence, this outcome variable was compared between case cycles with and without cancer surgical histories.
Results: Numbers of fertilized oocytes (FO), cleaving embryos (CE), and superior CE (SCE) were significantly lower in cases than controls. Rates of fertilization and of development to SCE from retrieved oocytes (RO), FO, or CE also were lower in cases than controls (63, 25, 39, and 43% vs. 72, 36, 50, and 55%, respectively). Cases had significantly lower rates of clinical pregnancy and livebirth per embryo transfer than controls (7.6 and 1.5% vs. 20.4 and 14.0%). Rates of development to SCE from RO, FO, and CE showed no significance for differences between cases with and without cancer operations (22, 37, and 40% vs. 31, 42, and 49%).
Conclusions: A woman's history of malignant neoplasia was associated with decreased oocyte developmental competence, possibly related to patient's background factors predisposing to tumor.
Keywords: assisted reproductive technology, oocyte developmental competence, fertility preservation, history of cancer
INTRODUCTION
Cancer occurs all too frequently in young adults. For example, over 70,000 persons between 15 and 39 years old are diagnosed with malignant neoplasms each year in the US (Coccia et al., 2014). In one study of cancer patients of reproductive age, 47 to 63% desired to have children after tumor diagnosis and treatment (Letourneau et al., 2012). Embryo or oocyte cryopreservation before cancer treatment as fertility preservation is recommended by American and European oncologic societies (Loren et al., 2013; Peccatori et al., 2013).
Because embryo cryopreservation requires a committed sexual partner or a sperm donor, and may encounter social or religious objections in some countries and communities, oocyte cryopreservation is performed and investigated more often. In addition, a smaller fraction among women with a cancer history ultimately thaw their cryopreserved oocytes for childbearing than among women with no cancer history (Cobo et al., 2018). For these reasons, the developmental competence of oocytes and pregnancy rates have not been investigated thoroughly for cryopreserved oocytes from patients with a history of malignant disease. Most previous studies have focused on differences in numbers of oocytes obtained for cryopreservation between women with and without a cancer diagnosis (Lekovich et al., 2016; Klock et al., 2010; Pal et al., 1998; Quintero et al., 2010; Robertson et al., 2011; Quinn et al., 2017; Almog et al., 2012; Oktay et al., 2006; Knopman et al., 2009), rather than oocyte developmental potential or pregnancy rates (Cobo et al., 2018; Pal et al., 1998; Quintero et al., 2010; Almog et al., 2012; Oktay et al., 2006). Furthermore, for both cryopreserved and fresh oocytes, the influence of a cancer history on assisted reproduction outcome is still unclear.
Some past studies suggested that malignant neoplasm could negatively affect fertility. A large cohort study of cancer survivor in Scotland showed a negative impact of cancer on subsequent achievement of pregnancy (Anderson et al., 2018). In addition, concentrations of anti-Mullerian hormone have been found to be low in patients with cancer even before it is treated (Harzif et al., 2019). Thus, patients with malignant neoplasia might have decreased ovarian reserve and potential for fertility even before beginning cancer treatment. However, whether the cause of these deficits lies in the tumor itself or in background factors predisposing to tumor.
To clarify effects of malignant tumors on oocyte developmental competence, we compared fertilization, embryonic development, and pregnancy rate between patients with and without a medical history of malignant tumors. In sub-analyses we investigated whether the malignant tumors themselves affected oocyte developmental competence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population
A case-control study was conducted starting with data from a total of 635 cycles of oocyte retrieval performed at Toranomon Hospital in Tokyo from January 2010 to December 2019. Since blastocyst cultures were carried out in only 49 cycles during this period, these were excluded from analysis. Ninety cycles were excluded because of previous ovarian surgery (45 cycles), previous chemotherapy (5 cycles), history of malignant tumor in male partner (16 cycles), or oocyte cryopreservation alone (24 cycles). The remaining 496 cycles represented our study population. The case group was defined as oocyte retrievals from women with a history of malignant neoplasia (52 cycles). From remaining the 444 cycles involving no such history, 52 control group cycles were randomly selected according to propensity score adjustment based on age and body mass index (BMI) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Study population enrollment flow chart. Among 635 cycles of ART performed at Toranomon Hospital from 2010 to 2019, 139 cycles were excluded because of previous ovarian surgery, previous chemotherapy, history of malignant tumor in male partner, oocyte cryopreservation, or blastocyst culture. The remaining 496 cycles represented our study population. Fifty-two cycles where women had a history of malignant tumor made up the case group. The 52 cycles in the control group were randomly chosen from the non-cancer study population by computer matching of propensity scores involving age and body mass index.
Design of the case-control study
Oocytes were retrieved after stimulation with gonadotropin and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist. Fourteen cycles in the case group were stimulated without gonadotropin because the patient's breast cancer showed high hormonal receptivity based on receptor testing. In vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was selected according to condition of the semen. Fertilization was confirmed on the day after IVF/ICSI. Fresh embryo transfer (ET) or embryo cryopreservation was performed 2 or 3 days after oocyte retrieval. We defined superior cleaving embryos (SCE) as Grade 1 or 2 according to Veeck's criteria (Scott et al., 1991). Pregnancy was defined as concentration of serum hCG beta subunit exceeding 50 IU/L at 14 days after embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy was defined as detection of a gestational sac by transvaginal ultrasonography. Ongoing pregnancy was defined by detection of a fetal heartbeat.Oocyte developmental competence and rates of pregnancy and live birth were compared between case and control groups as the main outcome measures of the study.
Sub-analyses
Among the 52 cycles in the case group, the patient's history in 25 cycles involved breast cancer (48%); 9 cycles, cancer of the uterine corpus (17%); 2 cycles, cancer of the uterine cervix (4%); 9 cycles, cancer of the thyroid (17%); 3 cycles, gastrointestinal cancer (6%); and 4 cycles, lymphoma or leukemia (8%). The 25 cycles involving breast cancer included stage 0 in 1 cycle (4%), stage 1 in 20 cycles (80%), and stage 2 in 4 cycles (16%). To analyze the influence of breast cancer stage, we compared oocyte developmental competence between breast cancer stages in those 25 cycles (BC group). Next, to analyze the reproductive influence of malignant tumors apart from their treatment, we divided the case group into subgroups and compared oocyte developmental competence between cycles with and without surgical resections of malignant tumors (S+ vs. S-, n=33 and 19, respectively).
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using IMB SPSS (Statistical Program for Social Sciences) software version 27. Student's t tests were used for normally distributed data. For non-normal distributions of data, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for bivariate comparisons, the Kruskal-Wallis test for comparisons of 3 or more groups, and the Bonferroni test as the post hoc test. Chi-squared tests and Fisher's exact test were used to compare ratios. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used for non-parametric data. P values below 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Ethical approval
This study was conducted with the approval of the Research Ethics Review Committee at the Toranomon Hospital. We also provided for patient optouts from the research plan according to the instructions of the Research Ethics Review Committee.
RESULTS
Profiles of case-control study
No significant differences were evident between case and control groups for such general features as age (38.5±4.1 vs. 39.4±3.5), BMI (20.4±3.2 vs. 20.9±2.2), and basal endocrine profile values, except that baseline luteinizing hormone was significantly higher in the case than the control groups although the case group remained within the normal range (4.13±2.42 vs. 3.12±1.44; Table 1).
Table 1. Characteristics of case and control groups.
Main outcomes of the case-control study
Values for FO, CE, and SCE were significantly lower in the case group than the control group (2.8±2.5, 2.5±2.2, and 1.1±1.2 vs. 3.8±2.6, 3.4±2.5, and 1.9±1.6; Table 2). Values for RO tended to be lower in the case group than in the control group (4.4±4.2 vs. 5.2±3.5; p=0.060, Mann-Whitney U test). The rate of fertilization was significantly lower in the case group than the control group (63% vs. 72%; Table 2). The case group had significantly lower rates of development to SCE from any of RO, FO, or CE than the control group (25, 39, and 43% vs. 36, 50, and 55%; p<0.05, Chi-squared test; odds ratios [OR], 0.578, 0.630, and 0.610; confidence intervals [CI], 0.392-0.853, 0.407-0.974, and 0.387-0.962, respectively). Correlation between age and number of RO, FO, CE, and SCE in case and control groups are shown in Table 3. Significant negative correlations were evident between age and number of RO and FO in the control group (R= -0.299 and -0.274), while no significant correlations were observed in the case group (R=-0.060 and -0.024). No significant correlations were present between age and number of CE or SCE in either group. Clinical outcomes are included in Table 2. The case group had significantly lower rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth per ET than the control group (respectively 7.6 and 1.5% vs. 20.4 and 14.0%; p<0.05, Chi-squared test; OR, 0.319 and 0.095; CI, 0.117-0.877 and 0.016-0.585).
Table 2. Developmental potentials of oocytes and clinical outcomes of embryo transfer in case and control groups.
Table 3. Correlations between age and numbers of RO, FO, CE, or SCE in case and control groups.
Results of sub-analyses
No significant differences in numbers of RO, FO, CE, and SCE were evident among stages 0, 1, and 2 of breast cancer (respectively 0±0, 0±0, 0±0, and 0±0 in stage 0; 3.2±4.5, 2.2±1.9, 2.1±1.8, and 1.1±1.3 in stage 1; and 3.8±4.3, 2.8±3.8, 2.8±2.0, and 1.3±1.5 in stage 2; Kruskal-Wallis test). No significant differences were evident in general characteristics between S+ and S- groups, except that baseline estradiol was significantly higher in the S+ group (63.8±46.4 vs. 42.8±23.4, Table 4). No significant difference was noted in numbers of RO, FO, CE, or SCE between S+ and S- groups, nor in rates of development to SCE (Table 5).
Table 4. Patient profiles for sub analysis of groups with (S+) and without (S-) cancer surgery.
Table 5. Fertilization and embryonic development potentials of oocytes from patient with (S+) and without (S-) cancer surgerys.
DISCUSSION
This study investigated whether a history of malignant tumor affected oocyte developmental competence. Folliculogenesis was analyzed quantitatively by number of RO and qualitatively by oocyte developmental competence. The rates of development to SCE from RO, FO, and CE, which reflect oocyte developmental competence, all were significantly lower in the case group than the control group. The proportion of SCE among CE also was significantly lower in the case group. The number of RO was less in the case than the control group, but only at a borderline significance (p=0.06). Age and the number of RO showed a significant negative correlation in the control group but not in the case group, suggesting that ovarian dysfunction in the case group already was compromised, observing any effect of aging. FO, CE, and SCE, reflecting effects of both RO and oocyte developmental competence, again were significantly decreased in the case group. Altogether, our results indicate that women with a history of malignant disease are likely to have impaired folliculogenesis, sharply evident in terms of oocyte developmental competence and somewhat but less marked for number of RO.
Previous studies have shown conflicting results for number of RO, showing significant cancer related decreases in number of RO in some reports (Lekovich et al., 2016; Klock et al., 2010) but not others (Pal et al., 1998; Quintero et al., 2010; Robertson et al., 2011; Quinn et al., 2017; Almog et al., 2012; Oktay et al., 2006; Knopman et al., 2009). Five of these previous studies (Lekovich et al., 2016; Pal et al., 1998; Quintero et al., 2010; Almog et al., 2012; Oktay et al., 2006) considered fertilization rates, with 1 showing a significant decrease (Pal et al., 1998) but 4 finding no difference. None of these studies examined embryonic development beyond fertilization. Patients in these studies were in their early 30s, which is considerably younger than the mean age of 39 years in our study. This age-related difference in influence of malignant disease on RO and fertilization rate might reflect a greater ovarian reserve in younger women.
In sub-analyses, no significant difference in oocyte developmental competence was evident between ART carried out after resection of malignant tumors and ART without prior tumor resection. In addition, we found no significant difference in oocyte development related to stage of breast cancer. These results suggest that impaired oocyte developmental competence in patients with a history of malignant tumor might not have resulted from the tumors, but possibly from background factors shared by cancer development and infertility. Insulin resistance which is involved in the mechanism underlying polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a common disease underlying some case of infertility also has been suspected as a contributor to carcinogenesis associated with obesity (Wolin et al., 2010). Reactive oxygen species similarly have been linked to progression of malignant tumors (Liou & Storz, 2010; Aggarwal et al., 2019), ovulation disorders, decreased sperm function, and damage to embryos (Lu et al., 2018). Reactive oxygen species also have been implicated in development of PCOS (Mohammadi, 2019) and endometriosis (Máté et al., 2018). Relationships between advanced glycation end-products (AGE) and infertility (Jinno et al., 2011), and between AGE and carcinogenesis (Walter et al., 2019; Healey et al., 2019) have been suggested. Thus, risk factors for malignant tumors and infertility often appear to overlap.
Because embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation has encountered various difficulties, oocyte cryopreservation is more often performed and investigated at present. Further, fewer women with malignant tumors have been found to actually thaw their cryopreserved oocytes for childbearing than women who had undergone oocyte cryopreservation for other reasons than cancer (Cobo et al., 2018). Our present investigation of oocyte cryopreservation in patients with a history of cancer showed significantly decreased rates of oocyte development and pregnancy, so women with malignant tumors might need to be warned about a higher risk for infertility despite ART. Further, when infertility is encountered, shared background factors might pose higher risk of malignant tumors later in life.
Approval by Ethics Committee:
The protocol for this study was approved by the Research Ethics Review Board of Toranomon Hospital, dated January 20, 2021 (submission number 2145).
REFERENCES
Aggarwal V, Tuli HS, Varol A, Thakral F, Yerer MB, Sak K, Varol M, Jain A, Khan MA, Sethi G. Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer Progression: Molecular Mechanisms and Recent Advancements. Biomolecules. 2019;9:735. PMID: 31766246 DOI: 10.3390/biom9110735 Medline
Almog B, Azem F, Gordon D, Pauzner D, Amit A, Barkan G, Levin I. Effects of cancer on ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:957-60. PMID: 22763097 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.007 Medline
Anderson RA, Brewster DH, Wood R, Nowell S, Fischbacher C, Kelsey TW, Wallace WHB. The impact of cancer on subsequent chance of pregnancy: a population-based analysis. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1281-90. PMID: 29912328 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey216 Medline
Cobo A, García-Velasco J, Domingo J, Pellicer A, Remohí J. Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:2222-31. PMID: 30383235 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey321 Medline
Coccia PF, Pappo AS, Altman J, Bhatia S, Borinstein SC, Flynn J, Frazier AL, George S, Goldsby R, Hayashi R, Huang MS, Johnson RH, Beaupin LK, Link MP, Oeffinger KC, Orr KM, Reed D, Spraker HL, Thomas DA, von Mehren M, et al. Adolescent and young adult oncology, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12:21-32. PMID: 24453290 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0004 Medline
Harzif AK, Wiweko B, Addina P, Iswaranti K, Silvia M, Mariana A, Mutia K, Sumapraja K, Muharam R, Pratama G. Anti-Mullerian hormone levels in female cancer patients of reproductive age in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. F1000Res. 2019;8:159. PMID: 32185016 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.15728.1 Medline
Healey GD, Pan-Castillo B, Garcia-Parra J, Davies J, Roberts S, Jones E, Dhar K, Nandanan S, Tofazzal N, Piggott L, Clarkson R, Seaton G, Frostell A, Fagge T, McKee C, Margarit L, Conlan RS, Gonzalez D. Antibody drug conjugates against the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), a novel therapeutic target in endometrial cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:280. PMID: 31665084 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-019-0765-z Medline
Jinno M, Takeuchi M, Watanabe A, Teruya K, Hirohama J, Eguchi N, Miyazaki A. Advanced glycation end-products accumulation compromises embryonic development and achievement of pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:604-10. PMID: 21233108 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq388 Medline
Klock SC, Zhang JX, Kazer RR. Fertility preservation for female cancer patients: early clinical experience. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:149-55. PMID: 19406395 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.028 Medline
Knopman JM, Noyes N, Talebian S, Krey LC, Grifo JA, Licciardi F. Women with cancer undergoing ART for fertility preservation: a cohort study of their response to exogenous gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1476-8. PMID: 18804204 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1727 Medline
Lekovich J, Lobel ALS, Stewart JD, Pereira N, Kligman I, Rosenwaks Z. Female patients with lymphoma demonstrate diminished ovarian reserve even before initiation of chemotherapy when compared with healthy controls and patients with other malignancies. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:657-62. PMID: 26943918 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0689-1 Medline
Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, Katz A, Ai WZ, Chien AJ, Melisko ME, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:1710-7. PMID: 21887678 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26459 Medline
Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2010;44:479-96. PMID: 20370557 DOI: 10.3109/10715761003667554 Medline
Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, Quinn G, Wallace WH, Oktay K; American Society of Clinical Oncology. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2500-10. PMID: 23715580 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2678 Medline
Lu J, Wang Z, Cao J, Chen Y, Dong Y. A novel and compact review on the role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:80. PMID: 30126412 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-018-0391-5 Medline
Máté G, Bernstein LR, Török AL. Endometriosis Is a Cause of Infertility. Does Reactive Oxygen Damage to Gametes and Embryos Play a Key Role in the Pathogenesis of Infertility Caused by Endometriosis? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:725. PMID: 30555421 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00725 Medline
Mohammadi M. Oxidative Stress and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Brief Review. Int J Prev Med. 2019;10:86. PMID: 31198521 DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_576_17 Medline
Oktay K, Hourvitz A, Sahin G, Oktem O, Safro B, Cil A, Bang H. Letrozole reduces estrogen and gonadotropin exposure in women with breast cancer undergoing ovarian stimulation before chemotherapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:3885-90. PMID: 16882752 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-0962 Medline
Pal L, Leykin L, Schifren JL, Isaacson KB, Chang YC, Nikruil N, Chen Z, Toth TL. Malignancy may adversely influence the quality and behaviour of oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1837-40. PMID: 9740435 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1837 Medline
Peccatori FA, Azim HA Jr, Orecchia R, Hoekstra HJ, Pavlidis N, Kesic V, Pentheroudakis G; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:vi160-70. PMID: 23813932 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt199 Medline
Quinn MM, Cakmak H, Letourneau JM, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Response to ovarian stimulation is not impacted by a breast cancer diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:568-74. PMID: 28122888 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew355 Medline
Quintero RB, Helmer A, Huang JQ, Westphal LM. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in patients with cancer. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:865-8. PMID: 19013563 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.007 Medline
Robertson AD, Missmer SA, Ginsburg ES. Embryo yield after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing embryo banking for fertility preservation before chemotherapy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:588-91. PMID: 20542508 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.028 Medline
Scott RT Jr, Hofmann GE, Veeck LL, Jones HW Jr, Muasher SJ. Embryo quality and pregnancy rates in patients attempting pregnancy through in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:426-8. PMID: 1991542 DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54141-7 Medline
Walter KR, Ford ME, Gregoski MJ, Kramer RM, Knight KD, Spruill L, Nogueira LM, Krisanits BA, Phan V, La Rue AC, Lilly MB, Ambs S, Chan K, Turner TF, Varner H, Singh S, Uribarri J, Garrett-Mayer E, Armeson KE, Hilton EJ, et al. Advanced glycation end products are elevated in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients, alter response to therapy, and can be targeted by lifestyle intervention. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173:559-71. PMID: 30368741 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4992-7 Medline
Wolin KY, Carson K, Colditz GA. Obesity and cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:556-65. PMID: 20507889 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0285 Medline