| Table 6. Main relationships of sperm parameters with ART outcomes. | |
| Presence of correlations | ART Outcomes |
|---|---|
| Obstructive azoospermia (OAZ) vs secretory azoospermia (SAZ) | Higher CPR, LBR |
| No association with: | |
| FR, ECR, high quality embryos, number of embryos for ET, CPR, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage rate, LBR, gestational age, | |
| birth weight, congenital malformations | |
| Low spermatozoa concentration (< 1M/ml) | Lower FR, Blastocyst rate |
| No association with: | |
| high quality blastocysts, Embryo aneuploidy, IR, ongoing pregnancy |
|
| Low spermatozoa motility (<5%) | Lower FR |
| No association with: | |
| blastocyst rate, embryo aneuploidy, IR, ongoing pregnancy | |
| Normal spermatozoa motility | Higher FR, IR, CPR |
| Spermatozoa morphology | Negative correlation with: |
| FR, embryo euploidy, IR, CPR, LBR | |
| Complete teratozoospermia | No association with: |
| BPR, CPR, miscarriage rate, LBR | |
| Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) | Lower FR |
| Severe OAT | No association with: |
| Gestational age, birth weight, congenital malformations | |
| Spermatozoa parameters | No association with: CPR, LBR |
| Male factor vs tubar factor | Higher FR, IR |
| No association with: | |
| CPR, miscarriage rate | |
| Moderate male factor | No association with: |
| Gestational age, birth weight, congenital malformations |
|
| Discrepancies rule the importance of sperm selection in ICSI in overcoming male factors | |