JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2024;28(1):9-12
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230018
1Department of Psychiatry, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
2Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia
3Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
4Clinic for Gynecology, Bethesda Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Postponing assisted reproductive technology treatment can cause pronounced
mental health problems. The aim of this study was to examine the level of
depression, anxiety, stress, and overall infertility-related distress
experienced by infertile couples during the pandemic, as well as the
differences between men and women in the examined variables and the
correlations between them.
Methods: A total of 131 participants were included in the study, 65 men and 66 women.
They were selected based on their responses in the Fertility Problems
Inventory (FPI); the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21); and
a general data questionnaire provided to them at the time of IVF.
Results: The levels of depression, anxiety, and stress in women and men resided within
the normal range. Depression (p<0.05), anxiety (p<0.01), stress
(p<0.01), and social concern (p<0.05) were more pronounced among
women. Significant correlations were found between depression, anxiety,
stress, and global stress and its three dimensions: social concern, sexual
concern, and relationship concern.
Conclusions: During the pandemic, women undergoing assisted reproductive technology
treatment experienced significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety,
stress, and overall infertility-related stress than men. Furthermore,
depression, anxiety, and stress were apparently correlated with overall
infertility-related stress.
Keywords: depression, anxiety, stress, infertility, COVID-19
INTRODUCTION
Infertility has been defined as "the inability to procreate, carry or deliver a baby
naturally after having tried for at least one year" (Vander Borght & Wyns, 2018). An estimated 10-15% of the individuals
of reproductive age have fertility problems (Vander
Borght & Wyns, 2018).
Numerous studies found correlations between infertility and increased levels of
stress, anxiety, and depression, as well as mental health issues in general (Rooney & Domar, 2018). However, the
relationship between psychological distress and infertility is by no means simple.
Although individuals with infertility may report higher levels of stress than those
without fertility problems, it remains questionable whether psychological distress
can lead to fertility difficulties (Greil,
1997). The literature shows that 25-60% of infertile individuals have
psychiatric symptoms and higher levels of depression and anxiety than their fertile
peers (De Berardis et al., 2014). Assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment has also been
associated with increased levels of depression and anxiety (García-Blanco et al., 2018), which tend to
subside after treatment success (Matthiesen et al., 2011). Treatment postponement became more
prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic, along with mental health issues (Boivin et al., 2020).
The aim of the study was to examine the levels of depression, anxiety, stress,
overall infertility-related stress in couples with fertility problems during the
COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the differences between men and women in the examined
variables and the correlations between observed variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This cross-sectional study included patients treated for infertility at the Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, a tertiary referral center, two months after the second major earthquake that hit Zagreb in 2020. In that specific time period, the clinic was temporarily inoperative due to the allocation of resources to deal with the substantial material damage caused by the earthquake and further complicated by the uncertainties of COVID-19. As the operations resumed, infertile couples were invited to answer three questionnaires: a general data questionnaire, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), and the Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI). Statistical analysis was performed with the independent samples t-test and Pearson's correlations. The local Institutional Ethics Committee approved the study.
Instruments
Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21)
The DASS-21 (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) is a shorter version of the original scale, which contained 42 items. This scale consists of 21 items and includes three sub-scales, each with seven items: depression (e.g. "I felt I had nothing to look forward to"), anxiety (e.g. "I felt I was close to panic"), and stress (e.g. "I found it hard to wind down"). Participants are asked to estimate how much each particular statement referred to them over the past week and rate them on a 4-point Likert scale (0 - did not apply to me at all, 1 - applied to me to some degree, or some of the time, 2 - applied to me a considerable degree or a good part of the time, 3 - applied to me very much or most of the time). The result is the summation of the points multiplied by two, giving a result between 0 and 42. Higher results indicate a higher level of depression, anxiety, and stress. This scale possesses great reliability of internal consistency. The calculated Cronbach's alpha values in a study by Crawford & Henry (2003) were a = 0.90 for the anxiety subscale, a=0.95 for the depression subscale, α=0.93 for the stress subscale, and α = 0.97 for the overall scale. Cronbach's alpha values in this study were α=0.88 for the depression subscale, a=0.85 for the anxiety sub-scale, and α = 0.92 for the stress subscale.
Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI)
The FPI (Newton et al., 1999) measures perceived infertility-related stress in five dimensions: social concern, sexual concern, relationship concern, rejection of childfree lifestyle, and need for parenthood. The total score portrays global stress related to infertility. The Inventory consists of 46 items scored on a 6-point scale (1 - completely disagree, 6 - completely agree). Some items are reversely coded. Higher scores indicate higher levels of stress. Cronbach's alpha values on a Croatian population were 0.79, 0.83, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.85 for social concern, sexual concern, relationship concern, rejection of childfree lifestyle and need for parenthood, respectively. The Cronbach's alpha for the whole scale was 0.90 (Nakić Radoš et al., 2022).
General data questionnaire
Sociodemographic information about age, marital status, education, occupation, property and income, area of residence, and earthquake exposure were collected in the general data questionnaire.
RESULTS
Participants
A total of 131 participants - 65 men and 66 women - with fertility problems were included in the study. Participant mean age was 35.115.06 years. Almost three quarters (74%) were married and 26% lived in extramarital unions. On average, the couples had been together for 9.3 years and had been married/living together for 5.4 years. Most of them (55.7%) had a high school degree, 42% had college degrees, and 2.3% finished primary school. Most were employed (89.3%). Household income was rated as average by 73.3% of the participants, as slightly below average by 1.5%, significantly below average by 0.8%, as slightly above average by 21.4%, and significantly above average by 2.3% of them. More than half (50.4%) of the participants live in a city with more than 100,000 people, 22.4% in a city with up to 100,000 people, and 26.2% in the countryside. Regarding the cause of infertility, 32.1% reported female factors, 17.6% reported both female and male factors, 13.7% reported male factors, and 36.6% reported unknown factors. The majority had been treated with in vitro fertilization (IVF) (48.1%), 23.7% with insemination, 8.4% with IVF and insemination, 1.5% with ICSI, and 17.6% had not been treated yet. Almost two thirds (64.1%) experienced the earthquake, while 35.9% did not.
Depression, anxiety, and stress in infertile couples and infertility-related stress
Mean values and standard deviations of the observed variables are shown in Table 1, as well as the p-values reported from an independent samples t-test (differences between male and female participants).

Table 1. Means, standard deviations, and p-values from t-test.
The recommended cutoff scores for conventional severity labels indicated that
study participants had normal depression, anxiety, and stress levels (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995).
An independent samples t-test was performed to examine
differences in depression, anxiety, and stress levels, social concern, sexual
concern, relationship concern, rejection of childfree lifestyle, need for
parenthood, and global stress between male and female participants.
Results showed a statistically significant higher level of depression, anxiety,
stress, and social concern in female participants.
Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated for depression, anxiety,
stress, global stress, and five dimensions of perceived infertility-related
stress (social concern, sexual concern, relationship concern, rejection of
childfree lifestyle, and need for parenting). Results are in Table 2.

Table 2. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between depression, anxiety,
stress, global stress, and five dimensions of infertility-related
perceived stress (social concern, sexual concern, relationship concern,
rejection of childfree lifestyle, and need for parenting).
There were statistically significant correlations between depression and anxiety, stress, global stress, and three dimensions of infertility-related perceived stress: social concern, sexual concern, and relationship concern. Anxiety was significantly correlated with stress, global stress, social concern, sexual concern, and relationship concern. Statistically significant correlations were also found between stress and global stress, social concern, sexual concern, and relationship concern. Global stress was significantly correlated with all dimensions of infertility-related perceived stress; social concern was significantly correlated with sexual and relationship concern; sexual concern was significantly correlated with relationship concern; relationship concern was significantly correlated with rejection of childfree lifestyle; rejection of childfree lifestyle was significantly correlated with need for parenthood.
DISCUSSION
Differently from previous studies, all participants had normal levels of depression,
anxiety, and stress (Volgsten et
al., 2008; Sejbaek et al., 2013; Pasch et al., 2016).
Levels of anxiety, depression, and stress were significantly higher in women. This
might be due to the ability women have to express emotional difficulties related to
mental health more easily than men. Most studies found that depression was twice as
common in women than in men (Cyranowski et
al., 2000). In females, this phenomenon was partially
explained by the impact of gonadal hormones on depression, especially in the
postpartum period and menopause.
In terms of gender differences of patients being treated for infertility, higher
levels of depression, cognitive dysfunction, and anxiety were found in women
compared with men. Conversely, men experienced psychosomatic distress and stress
more often, which correlate with lower quality of life. However, men had higher
scores in relationship satisfaction (Simionescu et al., 2021). Newton et al. (1999) found significantly higher values
on scales of global stress, social concern, sexual concern, and need for parenthood
in female patients with infertility than in male patients. This is in line with our
findings, in which female participants had higher scores on all measured variables,
although women only differed significantly on the social concern dimension compared
to men. A large body of previous studies also found similar results (Chehreh et al., 2019; Patel et al., 2016). Our
results showed a statistically significant higher level of depression, anxiety,
stress, and social concern in female participants. However, literature reports
indicate that men are seeking fertility treatment as often as women and experiencing
high levels of depression (Holley et
al., 2015). Furthermore, women were found to experience
higher stress levels during infertility treatment than men. They experience higher
levels of depression and anxiety, general psychological problems, and lower
self-esteem compared with men (El Kissi et
al., 2013). In our study, all patients experienced normal
levels of depression, anxiety, and stress.
The question is why the depression, anxiety, and stress levels in our population were
rated as normal, since previous studies indicated and the pandemic and the
earthquake were correlated with increases in mental health issues (Peitl et al., 2020; Thapa et al., 2018). Studies
examining groups of patients waiting for non-urgent gynecological surgery during the
time of the pandemic and the earthquake found normal levels of depression, anxiety,
and stress, which were attributed mainly to higher quality of life (Soljačić Vraneš et al., 2022).
A possible explanation for the low levels of depression, anxiety, and stress in this
population is the hope associated with the initiation of
assisted reproduction treatment. Additionally, self-report measures have their
limitations and may not be entirely accurate.
Infertility-related perceived stress in all its dimensions – social concern, sexual
concern, relationships concern, rejection of childfree lifestyle, and need for
parenthood – were significantly correlated with depression. Anxiety was
significantly correlated with stress, global stress, and three dimensions of
infertility-related perceived stress (social concern, sexual concern and
relationship concern). These results were consistent with previous research (Wang et al., 2015). Moura-Ramos et al. (2012) also
found positive correlations between depression, anxiety, and all dimensions of the
Fertility Problem Inventory. In other words, higher scores on depression and anxiety
scales were correlated with higher scores on measures of infertility-related
perceived stress and their dimensions. Our results were consistent with the findings
of Newton et al. (1999). Our
results, as well as the studies mentioned above, confirmed the idea that infertility
is a stressful experience that can cause mental health issues.
The limitations of the study include the fact that the questionnaires were answered
by couples attending the clinic regardless of treatment stage (first appointment,
scheduled ultrasound examination, time after oocyte retrieval, etc...). Each of
these events may trigger acute reactions. Nevertheless, our results may facilitate
the understanding of the emotional issues faced by infertile couples, especially in
challenging times such as the pandemic and the earthquake.
REFERENCES