| Table 3. Methodological assessment of the primary studies through the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research tool. | |||||||||||
| Qualitative study | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Total (Yes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speller et al. (2019a) | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | 7 |
| Garvelink et al. (2015) | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | 7 |
| Srikanthan et al. (2019) | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | 7 |
| Van den Berg et al. (2021) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | 8 |
| Speller et al. (2019b) | U | U | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 7 |
Q1 = Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?, Q2 = Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?, Q3 = Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?, Q4 = Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?, Q5 = Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?, Q6 = Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?, Q7 = Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice-versa, addressed?, Q8 = Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?, Q9 = Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?, Q10 = Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?, Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unclear.