Table 3. Literature survey on sperm retrieval successes of PESA as the first choice combined or not with TESA for later salvage performed in men with obstructive azoospermia.
Study (Year) Patients
n
Procedures
n
Adequate Sperm Rate
with PESA only n (%)
Rescue TESA
Rate n (%)
Cumulative PESA +
TESA Rate n (%)
This study 123 157 147/157 (93.6) 10/10 (100) 157/157 (100)
Craft et al. (1995a) 20 20 16/20 (80) 1/3 (33.3) 17/20 (85)
Craft et al. (1995b) 38 42 34/38 (89) - 89 (34/38)
Datta et al. (2016) 44 39 18/39 (46.1) 34/44 (77.3) -
Dohle et al. (1998) - 29 18/29 (62) 9/11 (81.8) 27/29 (93)
Esteves et al. (2013) 146 146 114/146 (78.1) 28/32 (87.5) 142/146 (97)
Glina et al. (2003) 58 79 65/79 (82) 14/14 (100) 79/79 (100)
Kovac et al. (2014) 68 68 51/68 (75) - 51/68 (75)
Levine et al. (2003) 94 94 91/94 (97) 3/3 (100) 94/94 (100)
Lin et al. (2000) 100 109 66/109 (61) 43/43 (100) 109/109 (100)
Meniru et al. (1997) 122 122 112/122 (91.8) 9/10 (90) 121/122 (99)
Rosenlund et al. (1998) 27 58 52/58 (89.7) 6/6 (100) 58/58 (100)
Tsirigotis et al. (1995) 36 40 32/40 (80) 8/8 (100) 40/40 (100)
Verza & Esteves (2008) 39 39 31/39 (81.5) 8/8 (100) 39/39 (100)
Yafi & Zini (2013) 255 255 216/255 (84.7) 48/48 (100) 255/255 (100)