Table 2. Comparison of ovarian stimulation data and outcomes between women who underwent elective fertility preservation before and after the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Characteristic Before Covid-19
(n=123)
After Covid-19
(n=451)
p value
Protocol type
GnRH antagonist
Short GnRH agonist
PPOS

121 (98.4%)
2 (1.6%)
0

357 (79.2%)
9 (2%)
85 (18.8%)
< 0.001
Ovarian stimulation duration (days) 10.9 (1.67) 11.2 (1.67) 0.069
GT total dose (mIU/mL) 3426.5 (1080.63) 3164.6 (842.87) 0.014
Peak E2 (pg/mL) 2680.2 (2101.53) 2752.2 (2322.03) 0.606*
Peak P (ng/mL) 1.3 (1.02) 1.1 (0.63) 0.575*
Final maturation trigger
GnRH agonist
hCG
hCG+GnRH agonist

110 (89.4%)
12 (9.8%)
1 (0.8%)

424 (94%)
21 (4.7%)
6 (1.3%)
0.091
Oocytes retrieved 16.4 (12.03) 15 (10.51) 0.545*
MII oocytes 13.1 (10.22) 11.7 (8.61) 0.364*
Oocyte maturity rate 78.1 (17.27) 77.4 (18.11) 0.719
Embryo cryopreservation
No
Yes

111 (90.2%)
12 (9.8%)

410 (90.9%)
41 (9.1%)
0.861
Sperm origin
Donor
Partner

11 (91.7%)
1 (8.3%)

31 (75.6%)
10 (24.4%)
0.421

Values are presented as mean (standard deviation) or number (%). A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
*The p value was calculated after log transformation for normal distribution.
GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; PPOS, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; GT, gonadotropins; E2, estradiol; P, progesterone; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; MII, metaphase II.