| Table 2. Some manuscripts published from 2010 that have used the time-lapse technology. | |
| Study | Aim/Description |
|---|---|
| Azzarello et al., 2012 | Pronuclei (PN) development in embryos after ICSI |
| (Athayde Wirka et al., 2014) | Identification of atypical embryo phenotypes by time-lapse, and correlation with embryo development |
| Aparicio-Ruiz et al., 2016 | To correlate morphokinetic parameters with blastocyst formation, quality, implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates |
| Aguilar et al., 2014 | Time correlation between fertilization events and embryo implantation |
| Armstrong et al., 2018 | Time-lapse cochrane review |
| Basile et al., 2014 | Elaborate with use of time-lapse an algorithm to increase the probability of noninvasively selecting a chromosomally normal embryo |
| Boueilh et al., 2018 | Evaluation of time-lapse imaging used in French IVF units |
| Coticchio et al., 2018 | Time-lapse analysis and novel aspects of human fertilization and new morphokinetic parameters of embryo viability |
| Cruz et al., 2012 | Correlation between embryo division kinetics and blastocyst formation |
| Chavez et al., 2012 | Precise cell cycle parameter timing is observed in all euploid embryos to the four-cell stage, whereas only 30% of aneuploid embryos exhibit parameter values within normal timing windows |
| Campbell et al., 2013a | Develop a model to categorize the risk of embryo aneuploidy based on morphokinetic parameters |
| Campbell et al., 2013b | Evaluate the effectiveness of the previously established, morphokinetic-based aneuploidy risk classification model |
| Chawla et al., 2015 | To analyse differences in morphokinetic parameters of euploid and aneuploid embryos utilizing time-lapse imaging and genetic analysis |
| Chen et al., 2013 | Time-lapse review |
| Dal Canto et al., 2012 | Analyse cleavage timings in relation to blastocyst formation and implantation |
| Fréour et al., 2013 | Evaluate of embryo morphokinetic parameters and female smoking status |
| Hashimoto et al., 2012 | Assess the development kinetics of embryos and their ability to develop to blastocyst |
| Iwata et al., 2014 | Analyse the timing of initiation of compaction in human embryos |
| Kirkegaard et al., 2013 | Duration of the first cytokinesis, duration of the 3-cell stage and direct cleavage to 3-cells predicted development to high-quality blastocyst |
| Meseguer et al., 2011 | Generate and evaluate an embryo selection tool based on morphokinetics |
| Meseguer et al., 2012 | Compare pregnancy outcomes in an incubator with time-lapse versus tissue culture chamber |
| Motato et al., 2016 | To correlate morphokinetic parameters with blastocyst formation and implantation |
| Muñoz et al., 2013 | Evaluate if type of GnRH analog used during controlled ovarian stimulation influences early embryo developmental kinetics |
| Montag, 2013 | Time-lapse review attempts to correlate timings with embryonic aneuploidy |
| Racowsky et al., 2015 | Time-lapse review |
| Rubio et al., 2012 | Analyse implantation rate of embryos with cleavage from 2 to 3 cells in less than five hours |
| Sciorio et al., 2020a, 2020b Marcos et al., 2015 |
Time-lapse imaging showed that blastocyst collapse(s) event is associated to low implantation potential |
| Sundvall et al., 2013 | To assess the variability of time-lapse annotations |
| Swain, 2013 | Review of studies that attempt to correlate timings with embryo aneuploidy |
| Wong et al., 2010 | Prediction of embryo potential to blastocyst stage using morphokinetic parameters |