Table 1. Categorical niPGT-A results before (1A) and after (1B) warming and short- term reculture
Table 1A. Classification of embryos after SCM-based niPGT-A
Embryo ID Classification Karyotype DNA Concentration(ng/µL)
M1 chaotic XX,-5(×1),-6(×1),-8(×1),+10(×3),+11(×3), +12(×3),+13(×3),-14(×1),-17(×1),-18(×1),-22(×1) 14.7
M2 chaotic X0,-X(×1),-5(×1),-9(×1),+13(×3),-14(×1),-17(×1) 24.0
M3 chaotic XX,+3(×3),-4(×1),-6(×1),+8(×3),-11(×1),+14(×3),+20(x3) 5.94
M4 chaotic XX,-1(×1),+3(×3),-4(×1),-8(×1),+9(×3),-21(×1) 3.75
M5 chaotic XX,+4(×3),+5(×3),+6(×3),-7(×1),-13(×1), -14(×1),-15(×1),+20(×3),+22(×3) 8.32
M6 chaotic XX,+1(×3),-14(×1),-15(×1),-17(×1),+18(×3),-21(×1) 17.1
M7 chaotic XXX,+X(×3),-1(×1),+4(×3),+19(×3),+20(×3),+22(×3) 15.0
Table 1B. Reclassification of ‘chaotic’ embryos after repeat SCM-based niPGT-A  
Embryo ID Classification Karyotype DNA Concentration(ng/µL)
M1 chaotic XX,+2(x3),+4(x3),+5(×3),+9(x3),+14(×3),+20(x3),+21(x3) 3.96
M2 euploid 46,XX 28.6
M3 chaotic XX,+3(×3),-4(×1),+11(×3),+14(×3),-18(x1),-19(x1),-21(x1) 15.3
M4 aneuploid XX,+11(x3),+12(x3),+21(×3),+22(×3) 19.7
M5 chaotic XX,-1(×1),-3(×1),-6(×1),+7(×3),-8(×1),-10(×1),+11(×3), +12(×3),+13(×3),+14(×3),+16(×3),+17(×3),+18(×3),+20(×3),+22(×3) 11.4
M6 euploid 46,XX 28.0
M7 euploid 46,XX 10.4