JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2025;29(Suppl 1):5-5
ORAL PRESENTATION

doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20250063

O-05. Does Blastocoel Expansion Influence IVF Success? Insights from a Retrospective Study

Rao Silvana1, Rolando Romina1, Catalano Débora1, Bello Ricardo2, Santome Matías1, Daneff Nicolás1, VazquezLevin Mónica Hebe3, Raffo Fernanda1

1Fertilab. Buenos Aires, Argentina
2Universidad de Tres de Febrero. Buenos Aires, Argentina
3IBYME-CONICET. Buenos Aires, Argentina

Objective: To evaluate the association between blastocoel expansion at devitrification/warming and transfer, and ART outcomes of clinical pregnancy (CP), live birth (LB) and miscarriage (M) in single vitrified/warmed blastocyst transfer cycles.
Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study includes single vitrified/warmed blastocyst transfer cycles performed at Fertilab in 2023. Blastocysts were obtained in ICSI cycles. Morphological grading was 3 or 4, AA-AB-BA-BB (Gardner criteria). Blastocysts were vitrified/devitrified using a commercial kit (Kitazato/Cryotop) following standardized procedures. All embryos were devitrified/warmed in the morning using Global Total LP medium, with transfer times varying depending on doctor and patient preferences as well as availability (45 min-6 h). Blastocoel expansion was subjectively assessed (Expanded=E; Collapsed=C) upon devitrification (E1,C1) and prior to transfer (E2,C2). Expanded blastocysts included 70-100% expansion; in Collapsed blastocysts the blastocoel was not visible. Four groups were defined after evaluation by 2 experienced embryologists: E1E2, C1E2, E1C2 and C1C2. Patients were followed until delivery. Outcomes evaluated: 1) CP (visualization of a gestational sac), 2) LB (birth of a live infant ≥24 weeks of gestation) and 3) M (non-viable pregnancy after confirmation of intrauterine pregnancy on ultrasound scan). Outcomes were expressed as rates (percentage) per transfer (CPR; LBR; MR). Cycles that resulted in biochemical pregnancies were not included in the study.
Results: 1) 80% (415/521) of total blastocysts were classified as E (E1E2=64%, C1E2=36%) while the remaining 20% (106/521) were classified as C (C1C2=74%; E1C2=26%). 2) Total CPR was 34% (178/521). Differences (p=0.0005) in CPR were found between E embryo transfer (Et: 38%; 158/415) and C embryo transfer (Ct: 19%; 20/106). Similar trends were found in subsets of a) patients oocytes (CPR: 39% for Et and 23% for Ct; p=0.03), b) donor oocytes (CPR: 37% for Et and 14% for Ct; p=0.005), c) patients grouped by age, both in young women (CPR women≤35y.o.: 37% for Et and 16% for Ct; p=0.004) and older women (CPR women>35y.o.: 41% for Et and 20% for Ct; p=0.005), d) in embryos with >2h of culture (Et=36%, Ct=15%; p<0.0001). 3) In the total population, LBR was 29%, with higher (p=0.0005) rates in Et (33%; 136/415) than in Ct (16%; 17/106). 4) In patients that achieved a CP, the chance to give birth or have a miscarriage was similar when E or C blastocysts were transferred (LBR: Et=86%, 136/158; Ct=85%, 17/20; p=1.00). Same trends were found in subsets of a) patients’ oocytes (LBR: Et=90%, 85/94; Ct=85%, 11/13: p=0.87), b) donor oocytes (LBR: Et=80%, 52/55; Ct=86%, 6/7; p=1.00), and c) patients grouped by age, both in young women (LBR: Et=85%, 78/92; Ct=80%, 8/10; p=1.00) and older women (LBR: Et=88%, 60/68; Ct=92%, 12/13; p=1.00).
Conclusion: The probability of achieving a clinical pregnancy is higher following the transfer of an expanded blastocyst. However, once a clinical pregnancy is established, the likelihood of live birth or miscarriage remains similar.