ISSN 1518 0557
Comparative analysis of two cryopreservation systems of ovarian tissues in female Wistar rats

2014; 18
Isabel Cirne Lima de Oliveira Durli, Ana Helena da Rosa Paz, Paula Barros Terraciano, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima
JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2014; 18 (1):7-11

Received January 21, 2014
Accepted February 20, 2014
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the most efficient protocol for cryopreservation of ovarian tissue using the automatic Freeze Control® system to test two different cooling curves combined with two different cryoprotectants: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and ethylene glycol (EG). Methods: In this study, 20 female Wistar rats underwent bilateral oophorectomy. The ovaries were divided into two parts: one cryopreserved in DMSO 1.5M and the other in EG 1.5M. Two cooling curves, slow (1h50min) and rapid (35min) were analyzed. Tissue samples were frozen, thawed, fixed, and processed for hematoxylin and eosin staining to analyze oocyte integrity. Follicular analysis was performed under optical microscopy (400x magnification) and preantral follicles were classified as primordial or primary according development stage. ANOVA was performed and Tukey’s test was used for comparison between means, with P<0.05 defined as significant. Results: In cryopreserved tissue, the follicles with preserved integrity in each ovary were 79% primordial and 29% primary. In non-frozen (control) tissue, all follicular types were observed (primordial, primary, secondary, preantral, and antral). Reversible changes included cytoplasmic vacuolization and irregular cell outline, and pyknosis occurred as an irreversible alteration. EG was more efficient as then DMSO, preserving a greater number of viable primordial and primary follicles. Nevertheless, comparison of both cooling curves revealed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: EG is indicated as the best cryoprotectant to obtain higher viable numbers of primordial and primary follicles from rat ovary tissue. Extra evaluations should be indicated to demonstrate ovarian functionality, as hormone levels detections.


This Article

doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20140085

Full Text (HTML)
Full Text (PDF)

Classifications

Original article

How to cite

How to cite this article

Send this article

Send this article by mail

Access statistics

Last 30 days: 26
All time: 511


Home

 
Copyright 2026 - JBRA Assisted Reproduction - All rights reserved.
Support and Maintenance by Eniosoft