JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2024;28(2):269-275
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240005
Vitamin D and follicular recruitment in the in vitro fertilization cycle
1Gynecology Department of the Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital - Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil
2Fertipraxis - Human Reproduction Center, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil
3Endocrinology Department of the Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil
4Translational Endocrinology Lab of the Carlos Chagas Filho, Biophysics Institute - Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Vitamin D (VD) is a fat-soluble steroid hormone, synthesized by the skin, most known for its role in bone mineral balance. Vitamin D receptors (VDR) are also found in the female reproductive system, but their role remains unclear. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between serum vitamin D levels and the number of oocytes retrieved after ovarian stimulation.
Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 267 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) carried out in the Fertipraxis clinic, a private practice facility. The patients were initially divided into two groups according to their VD levels. Group 1 included 152 patients with VD levels < 30 ng/mL and group 2 had 115 patients with VD levels > 30 ng/mL. They were further analyzed and separated considering their age, anthropometric data, ovarian reserve, amount of gonadotropin used, and follicles obtained until trigger day.
Results: In our analysis, there were no difference in the number of follicles and oocytes retrieved, nor in the number of mature oocytes obtained from patients with both vitamin D deficiency and sufficiency.
Conclusions: The results of our study show no difference among number of follicles, oocytes retrieved and mature oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation according to their vitamin D serum levels. Further higher-quality studies are needed to evaluate the possible roles of serum vitamin D levels in other stages of human fertilization process.
Keywords: vitamin D, infertility, in vitro fertilization, follicular development
INTRODUCTION
Vitamin D (VD) is a fat-soluble steroid hormone, synthesized by the skin, known for its role in calcium and phosphorus metabolism, and bone remodeling. It is essential to maintain bone mineral balance (Irani & Merhi, 2014; Rehman et al., 2021; Tian et al., 2022). Its most common form in circulation is 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25OH-D), synthesized by the liver, then metabolized in the kidneys by the 1-alpha-hydroxylase enzyme into its active form, 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin-D (1,25(OH)2D) (Irani & Merhi, 2014; Hornstein, 2019; Makieva et al., 2021). 1,24(OH)2D acts through its binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR) (Rehman et al., 2021; Tian et al., 2022, Karimi et al., 2021).
Even though VD classical actions are described in the calcium-phosphate metabolism, the presence of VDR and enzyme 1 alpha-hydroxylase in the endometrium, ovaries (granulosa cells and cumulus oophorous), placenta, hypothalamus, and pituitary gland indicate that VD might play a part in human reproduction. Several studies have been carried out to elucidate the role of VD in human reproduction, suggesting its relationship with spermatogenesis, ovarian reserve, follicular development, embryonic implantation, endometrial thickness, and its correlation with in vitro fertilization (IVF) (Rehman et al., 2021; Tian et al., 2022; Hornstein, 2019; Neville et al., 2016). In addition, other studies suggest that VD may influence the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) activity through its 25OH-D form, which would act on AMH type II receptors (AMHR-2) to inhibit the recruitment and maturation of follicles (Hornstein, 2019; Muscogiuri et al., 2017; Skowrońska et al., 2022; Voulgaris et al., 2017). Hypovitaminosis D is correlated with insulin resistance, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis (Tian et al., 2022; Neville et al., 2016; Dastorani et al., 2018; Cunningham et al., 2019).
VD deficiency is frequently found in women at reproductive age, affecting more than 123 million women and 15% of the infertile population worldwide (Cozzolino et al., 2020; Fernando et al., 2020; Antunes et al., 2018). It can be defined as levels below 20 ng/mL, while insufficiency is when those levels are between 20 and 30 ng/mL (Irani & Merhi, 2014). Although, it is important to emphasize that these definitions were obtained from data of VD effects in bone remodeling. VD role in reproduction is still controversial, requiring more studies on the subject (Abadia et al., 2016; Lv et al., 2016). In our study, we used 30 ng/mL as parameter for the division between the groups, as it is the value referred by the Endocrine Society of North America (Irani & Merhi, 2014).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Retrospective study of 267 patients, between 29 and 40 years old, undergoing IVF at the Fertipraxis clinic between January 2017 and December 2020. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (G1) is made up of 152 patients with insufficient or deficient vitamin D levels (less than 30 ng/mL). Group 2 (G2), has 115 patients with normal levels of vitamin D (greater than ≥ 30 ng/mL).
All our VD plasma level samples were obtained together with the couple’s blood tests for the required serologies according to the Brazilian regulatory norms for IVF. Therefore, all VD evaluations were collected up to three months from the beginning of the stimulation cycles. The patients that were supplementing VD, kept on doing so without changes in their supplementation protocol. No patients started new VD supplementation based on the presented VD levels.
Ovarian stimulation was performed with combinations of FSH and LH (Menopur®, Ferring Switzerland and Pergoveris®, Merck, Germany) ranging from 150UI to 300UI a day, according to clinical demands. Pituitary blockage was achieved using Cetrorelix Acetate (Cetrotide®, Merck, Germany), initiated when the largest follicle reached 14mm.
Initially, we ran a descriptive analysis of vitamin D, oocytes retrieved, M2 mature oocytes by the end of stimulation, follicles ≥ 15mm, follicles between 10-14 mm, total FSH administered, stimulus duration, presence of endometriosis, BMI, AMH level and age.
Subsequently, 6 Generalized Linear Models using the Gamma distribution were run to test the impact of vitamin D on the variables mentioned above. The Gamma distribution was chosen because the outcome variables were not normally distributed according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The analysis was performed using the SPSS for Windows version 23 software.
The primary objective of this study was to compare the number of oocytes retrieved and mature oocytes among both groups. The secondary objective was the analysis of the difference between duration of stimulation, quantity of gonadotropins used and follicular size.
RESULTS
Group 1 had an average plasma VD level of 23.1 ng/mL (ranging from 11.0ng/mL - 29.9ng/mL); while Group 2 had 39.08ng/mL (range 30.0ng/mL - 66.4ng/mL). Table 1 presents the descriptive results of the continuous variables.
Table 1. Descriptive results of continuous variables.
Women in both groups had similar age and anthropometric characteristics (BMI in G1: 25.04±5.53 x BMI in G2: 24.31±6,32), as well as stimulation time and dosage of gonadotropins used. G1 showed slightly higher AMH levels (2.09) compared to G2 (1.88), but that it was not statistically significant (p<0.18) in our study. The number of recruited follicles was consistent between both groups. Among those ranging from 10 to 14mm, G1 had an average of 7.31 and G2 7.84 (p<0.122). When evaluating those greater than 15mm, G1 had an average of 4.34, while G2 had an average of 4.43 (p<0.169). There were no differences between the numbers of recovered oocytes (G1 9.03 x G2 9.81 - p<0.105) and MII oocytes by the end of the stimulation (G1 6.80 x G2 7.46 - p<0.121). Table 2 presents the results of the six Generalized Linear Models (Gamma distribution) that tested the impact of vitamin D on the outcome variables previously described. As we can see, vitamin D was not a predictor variable in any model tested (p>.05).
Table 2. Results of Generalized Linear Models tested (Gamma distribution).
Considering that the Chi-square of the General Model was statistically significant, evidencing the possibility that the control variables had had a significant impact on the outcomes. Table 3 shows the results of the tested control variables, considering the β-regression coefficient of each model.
Table 3. Results of control variables tested.
Furthermore, a Spearman correlation analysis was performed between vitamin D levels and possible outcomes, in addition to other variables such as age, BMI and AMH. The choice for a non-parametric analysis was made because the variables did not have a normal distribution (Table 4). The cutoff points used for interpreting the correlation coefficients: 0.00 - 0.10 = negligible correlation; 0.11 - 0.29 = weak correlation; 0.30 - 0.49 = moderate correlation and > 0.50 = strong correlation (Cohen, 1988).
Table 4. Correlation analysis results.
Vitamin D levels also did not correlate with any of the analyzed variables, except for a significant inverse correlation with age in the study group (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Spearman Correlation on Vitamin D x Retrieved Oocytes; Vitamin D x M2 oocytes; Vitamin D x Age.
Among the causes of infertility, the most common one in both groups was the male factor, followed by the ovarian factor in G1 and alterations in the female anatomy in G2. Only 2 patients in the first group and 3 in the second group had PCOS.
DISCUSSION
Vitamin D has been discussed as a possible modifiable factor related to infertility (Gaskins & Chavarro, 2018). There are receptors for it in the female reproductive system, but its function is still unclear (Franasiak et al., 2017; Fichera et al., 2020; Somigliana et al., 2021). Among the possible actions of VD in reproduction, we can highlight its role in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation, in addition to embryonic implantation (Fichera et al., 2020; Grzeczka et al., 2022). In our study we tried to determine if there is an actual correlation between plasma levels of vitamin D, follicular growth and oocyte maturity rates. However, our data shows no such correlation.
Neville et al. (2016) evaluated 73 men and 64 women, assessing the role of VD in both male and female reproductive systems. The study found no association between VD levels and each partner’s variables for IVF outcomes. In our study, a higher rate of recovered oocytes was found among patients with normal VD levels, but without statistical significance.
Banker et al. (2017) analyzed 291 patients, including egg donors and recipients, without finding better oocyte quality results or greater endometrial receptivity in subgroups with replete VD.
Abadia et al. (2016) in their analysis of 100 women undergoing IVF subdivided its study population in quartiles according to their 25OH-D status and also found no difference in the number of retrieved M2 oocytes in each group. They found a significant correlation between fertilization rates and higher 25OH-D levels; however, they have not analyzed the partner’s VD status which might prove to be an important confounder. They also did not find any correlation with clinical pregnancy rates or live birth rates (Abadia et al., 2016).
In their study, Iliuta et al. (2022) analyzed 15 articles from 9 different countries and found no relationship between normal VD levels, the number of oocytes retrieved and implantation rates. However, there was statistical significance between VD repletion and biochemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rate (Wu et al., 2018). Like in our study, there was no improvement in the quantity of oocytes recovered in the group with VD repletion.
Both Wu et al. (2018) and Antunes et al. (2018) have found a direct correlation between VD follicular and plasma levels. However, while Wu et al. (2018) encountered a significant higher number of mature oocytes and blastocyst formation rate in the higher follicular VD group, Antunes et al. found no significant difference between the number of mature oocytes in both groups and did not evaluate blastocysts, whilst a higher number of larger follicles (>16mm diameter) were found in the lower follicular VD group (Antunes et al., 2018).
It is important to emphasize that in our series, we had only 5 cases of PCOS, since some authors, such as Várbíró et al. (2022) and Hu et al. (2020), have associated this pathology with a spontaneous decrease in the chance of ovulation. In these patients, the probability of ovulation correlates with the level of VD, being 68% in cases of deficiency, 77% if insufficiency and 78% when the level is normal (Hu et al., 2020). We stipulate that this fact is due to the apparent relationship between the normal level of VD and the improvement in insulin resistance, present in this pathology (Hu et al., 2020; Shahrokhi et al., 2016).
In a retrospective analysis, Ko et al. (2022) found a direct correlation between lower cumulative live birth rates of a single IVF stimulation cycle and deficient plasma 25OH-D levels prior to ovarian stimulation. Despite that, the total number of retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes was similar between both groups, which is the same finding reported in our current research.
Some studies show that patients with VD deficiency are less successful with IVF and report more frequent miscarriages and lower live birth rates (Várbíró et al., 2022; Bezerra Espinola et al., 2021; Cyprian et al., 2019). Zhao et al. (2018) performed a meta-analysis encompassing 9 studies, reinforcing this data, since they found a higher rate of live births in patients with normal VD. However, in a more recent meta-analysis, Cozzolino et al. (2020) found no correlation between IVF clinical outcomes and serum VD levels. Also, Zhou et al. (2022) showed that there is no benefit in performing vitamin D replacement for subsequent treatment.
The strengths of this study include the specific analysis of VD influence over follicle maturation in IVF cycles, as well as the number of subjects analyzed. There is still a lot of controversies on which parts of the fertilization process VD might play a significant role, and, with this study design we could evaluate its role directly on follicular and oocyte development in ovarian stimulation cycles. Another important point to highlight is that several common confounders that could influence our results were balanced between our two groups, which was the case with obesity, age and AMH.
Despite its strengths, it is important to highlight the potential weaknesses in our study, mainly the retrospective nature of the design, as well as the lack of report on clinical outcomes, such as implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates or even live birth rates. Although, as explained before, our focus was specifically on VD influence on the oocyte and follicle to avoid potential biases.
Another important point to emphasize is the chosen cutoff values of serum VD according to those from the Endocrine Society of North America, and not those from the Institute of Medicine, which would be higher or lower than 20ng/mL (Ross et al., 2011). In our study population, most patients supplemented vitamin D previously before arriving at our center for IVF treatment start. This could be an explanation for almost no patients having presented serum VD levels below 20ng/mL before ovarian stimulation began, both study groups presented average levels higher than 20ng/mL. Specific analysis comparing a group with lower than 20ng/mL serum VD with another with higher than 30ng/mL serum VD might have shown different results. However, at least in a Brazilian population, we found it difficult to enroll patients with a deficient state of serum vitamin D (<20ng/mL) before starting IVF treatment.
Regarding patients using VD supplementation, it should be noted that all VD samples were collected up to 3 months from the starting day of the ovarian stimulation onset date. Although this is another potential bias for the study, we understand that its analysis was performed in proximity to the IVF cycle and could very well reflect the actual VD plasma levels of the patients during the stimulation period. To mitigate potential alterations of the VD plasma levels from the time that VD was evaluated, and there were no changes on already started supplementations, neither were any type of supplementation started after the blood sample was collected.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of our study showed no difference among number of follicles, oocytes retrieved, and mature oocytes obtained after the ovarian stimulation, when VD plasma levels of 30ng/mL were predefined as the benchmark values for optimal reproductive outcomes. However, VD may act in other stages of fertilization, such as implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, as well as, live birth rates, or even in the studied outcomes if groups with lower plasma levels were to be compared. Therefore, further studies on the subject and better evaluation of the IVF process with different VD cutoff values should be pursued.
REFERENCES
Abadia L, Gaskins AJ, Chiu YH, Williams PL, Keller M, Wright DL, Souter I, Hauser R, Chavarro JE; Environment and Reproductive Health Study Team. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and treatment outcomes of women undergoing assisted reproduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104:729-35. PMID: 27465382 DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.126359 Medline
Antunes RA, Mancebo ACA, Reginatto MW, Deriquehem VAS, Areas P, Bloise E, Chiamolera MI, Ribeiro GCM, Carvalho ARS, Souza MCB, Ortiga-Carvalho TM. Lower follicular fluid vitamin D concentration is related to a higher number of large ovarian follicles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36:277-84. PMID: 29361453 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.12.010 Medline
Banker M, Sorathiya D, Shah S. Vitamin D Deficiency Does Not Influence Reproductive Outcomes of IVF-ICSI: A Study of Oocyte Donors and Recipients. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017;10:79-85. PMID: 28904494 DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_117_16 Medline
Bezerra Espinola MS, Bilotta G, Aragona C. Positive effect of a new supplementation of vitamin D3 with myo-inositol, folic acid and melatonin on IVF outcomes: a prospective randomized and controlled pilot study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37:251-4. PMID: 32367738 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1760820 Medline
Cozzolino M, Busnelli A, Pellegrini L, Riviello E, Vitagliano A. How vitamin D level influences in vitro fertilization outcomes: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:1014-25. PMID: 33012554 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.040 Medline
Cunningham TK, Allgar V, Dargham SR, Kilpatrick E, Sathyapalan T, Maguiness S, Mokhtar Rudin HR, Abdul Ghani NM, Latiff A, Atkin SL. Association of Vitamin D Metabolites With Embryo Development and Fertilization in Women With and Without PCOS Undergoing Subfertility Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:13. PMID: 30761082 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00013 Medline
Cyprian F, Lefkou E, Varoudi K, Girardi G. Immunomodulatory Effects of Vitamin D in Pregnancy and Beyond. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2739. PMID: 31824513 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02739 Medline
Dastorani M, Aghadavod E, Mirhosseini N, Foroozanfard F, Zadeh Modarres S, Amiri Siavashani M, Asemi Z. The effects of vitamin D supplementation on metabolic profiles and gene expression of insulin and lipid metabolism in infertile polycystic ovary syndrome candidates for in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:94. PMID: 30286768 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-018-0413-3 Medline
Fernando M, Ellery SJ, Marquina C, Lim S, Naderpoor N, Mousa A. Vitamin D-Binding Protein in Pregnancy and Reproductive Health. Nutrients. 2020;12:1489. PMID: 32443760 DOI: 10.3390/nu12051489 Medline
Fichera M, Török P, Tesarik J, Della Corte L, Rizzo G, Garzon S, Carlea A, Di Angelo Antonio S, Zito G, Panella MM. Vitamin D, reproductive disorders and assisted reproduction: evidences and perspectives. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2020;71:276-85. PMID: 31928386 DOI: 10.1080/09637486.2019.1661978 Medline
Franasiak JM, Lara EE, Pellicer A. Vitamin D in human reproduction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;29:189-94. PMID: 28562440 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000375 Medline
Gaskins AJ, Chavarro JE. Diet and fertility: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:379-89. PMID: 28844822 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.010 Medline
Grzeczka A, Graczyk S, Skowronska A, Skowronski MT, Kordowitzki P. Relevance of Vitamin D and Its Deficiency for the Ovarian Follicle and the Oocyte: An Update. Nutrients. 2022;14:3712. PMID: 36145088 DOI: 10.3390/nu14183712 Medline
Hu KL, Gan K, Wang R, Li W, Wu Q, Zheng B, Zou L, Zhang S, Liu Y, Wu Y, Chen R, Cao W, Yang S, Liu FT, Tian L, Zeng H, Xu H, Qiu S, Yang L, Chen X, et al. Vitamin D supplementation prior to in vitro fertilisation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a protocol of a multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e041409. PMID: 33293396 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041409 Medline
Iliuta F, Pijoan JI, Lainz L, Exposito A, Matorras R. Women’s vitamin D levels and IVF results: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, considering three categories of vitamin status (replete, insufficient and deficient). Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022;25:228-46. PMID: 32791871 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1807618 Medline
Irani M, Merhi Z. Role of vitamin D in ovarian physiology and its implication in reproduction: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:460-8.e3. PMID: 24933120 DOI: /10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.046 Medline
Karimi E, Arab A, Rafiee M, Amani R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between vitamin D and ovarian reserve. Sci Rep. 2021;11:16005. PMID: 34362981 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95481-x Medline
Ko JKY, Shi J, Li RHW, Yeung WSB, Ng EHY. 100 YEARS OF VITAMIN D: Effect of serum vitamin D level before ovarian stimulation on the cumulative live birth rate of women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a retrospective analysis. Endocr Connect. 2022;11:e210444. PMID: 35029541 DOI: 10.1530/EC-21-0444 Medline
Lv SS, Wang JY, Wang XQ, Wang Y, Xu Y. Serum vitamin D status and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293:1339-45. PMID: 27022933 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4058-1 Medline
Makieva S, Reschini M, Ferrari S, Bonesi F, Polledri E, Fustinoni S, Restelli L, Sarais V, Somigliana E, Viganò P. Oral Vitamin D supplementation impacts gene expression in granulosa cells in women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:130-44. PMID: 33305818 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa262 Medline
Muscogiuri G, Altieri B, de Angelis C, Palomba S, Pivonello R, Colao A, Orio F. Shedding new light on female fertility: The role of vitamin D. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18:273-83. PMID: 28102491 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-017-9407-2 Medline
Neville G, Martyn F, Kilbane M, O’Riordan M, Wingfield M, McKenna M, McAuliffe FM. Vitamin D status and fertility outcomes during winter among couples undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;135:172-6. PMID: 27530219 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.018 Medline
Rehman R, Alam F, Baig M, Khan AH, Ahmed N. Editorial: Vitamin D Deficiency and Sufficiency in Reproduction and Bone Metabolism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:740021. PMID: 34552565 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.740021 Medline
Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones G, Kovacs CS, Mayne ST, Rosen CJ, Shapses SA. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:53-8. PMID: 21118827 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2010-2704 Medline
Shahrokhi SZ, Ghaffari F, Kazerouni F. Role of vitamin D in female reproduction. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;455:33-8. PMID: 26747961 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.12.040 Medline
Skowrońska P, Kunicki M, Pastuszek E, Konieczna L, Bączek T, Męczekalski B, Smolarczyk R, Łukaszuk K. Vitamin D and anti-Müllerian hormone concentration in human follicular fluid individually aspirated from all patient follicles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2022;38:28-32. PMID: 34044669 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2021.1933934 Medline
Somigliana E, Sarais V, Reschini M, Ferrari S, Makieva S, Cermisoni GC, Paffoni A, Papaleo E, Vigano P. Single oral dose of vitamin D3 supplementation prior to in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in normal weight women: the SUNDRO randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:283.e1-283.e10. PMID: 33894153 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.234 Medline
Tian M, Zeng S, Cai S, Reichetzeder C, Zhang X, Yin C, Kuang W, Cheng K, Jiang Y, Tao M, Zeng Y, Lin G, Li J, Gong F, Hocher B. 25(OH)VitD and human endocrine and functional fertility parameters in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:986848. PMID: 36105399 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.986848 Medline
Várbíró S, Takács I, Tűű L, Nas K, Sziva RE, Hetthéssy JR, Török M. Effects of Vitamin D on Fertility, Pregnancy and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome-A Review. Nutrients. 2022;14:1649. PMID: 35458211 DOI: 10.3390/nu14081649 Medline
Voulgaris N, Papanastasiou L, Piaditis G, Angelousi A, Kaltsas G, Mastorakos G, Kassi E. Vitamin D and aspects of female fertility. Hormones (Athens). 2017;16:5-21. PMID: 28500824 DOI: 10.14310/horm.2002.1715 Medline
Wu L, Kwak-Kim J, Zhang R, Li Q, Lu FT, Zhang Y, Wang HY, Zhong LW, Liu YS. Vitamin D level affects IVF outcome partially mediated via Th/Tc cell ratio. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;80:e13050. PMID: 30291647 DOI: 10.1111/aji.13050 Medline
Zhao J, Huang X, Xu B, Yan Y, Zhang Q, Li Y. Whether vitamin D was associated with clinical outcome after IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:13. PMID: 29426322 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-018-0324-3 Medline
Zhou X, Wu X, Luo X, Shao J, Guo D, Deng B, Wu Z. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes: A Trial Sequential Meta-Analysis of 5 Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:852428. PMID: 35370977 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.852428 Medline