JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2023;27(1):78-84
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230009

The Ala307Thr polymorphism of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) gene is associated with the dose of recombinant FSH received during IVF/ICSI treatment

Felipe Dieamant1,2, Claudia Guilhermino Petersen1,2, Laura Diniz Vagnini2, Bruna Petersen1,2, Juliana Ricci1, Andreia Nicoletti1, Camila Zamara1, Antonio Helio Oliani3, Joao Batista A. Oliveira1,2, José G. Franco Jr.1,2,3

1Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
2Paulista Center for Diagnosis, Research and Training, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
3Sao Jose do Rio Preto School of Medicine FAMERP, Sao Jose do Rio, SP, Preto, Brazil

Received August 02, 2022
Accepted February 21, 2023

Corresponding author
Jose Gonçalves Franco Jr
Center for Human Reproduction Prof Franco Jr
Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
E-mail: crh@crh.com.br

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

ABSTRACT
Objective: Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is essential for folliculogenesis, acting through the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) that is present on the membrane of granulosa cells. Polymorphisms in the FSHR gene may lead to an altered pattern of receptor expression on the cell surface or to changes in affinity for FSH. The aim of this prospective study was to detect any association between the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) gene Ala307Thr polymorphism (rs6165) and ovarian reserve, ovarian response or clinical results in IVF/ICSI treatment.
Methods: This prospective cohort study included 450 women who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood, and the Ala307Thr FSHR polymorphism (rs6165) was genotyped using the TaqMan SNP genotyping assay. Participants were divided into three groups according to their Ala307Thr FSHR genotype: Thr/Thr (n:141), Thr/Ala (n=213) and Ala/Ala (n=96). The results were tested for associations with age, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels, antral follicle count (AFC), total dose of r-FSH, follicle size, number of retrieved oocytes, and clinical outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles. The statistical analyses were performed using Fisher’s exact test and the Kruskal‒Wallis test.
Results: An association between the genotype of the FSHR (Ala307Thr) polymorphism and the dose of r-FSH was observed. Patients with the Ala/Ala genotype received a higher r-FSH dose than patients with the Ala/Thr (p=0.0002) and Thr/Thr (p=0.02) genotypes. No other correlation was observed.
Conclusion: The Ala/Ala genotype was associated with the use of higher doses of recombinant FSH (r-FSH), suggesting that homozygosis of this allelic variant (Ala) provides lower sensitivity to r-FSH.

Keywords: FSH, FSHR gene, Ala307Thr polymorphism, ovarian response, ovarian stimulation

INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of infertility is on the rise, affecting approximately 15 to 20% of couples of reproductive age. This condition has medical, social and even financial implications for couples. With the advent of assisted reproduction techniques such as in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), several causes of infertility have been successfully managed, and thousands of patients have benefited and are still benefiting from this technological evolution. Currently, approximately 5% of all births in developed countries are due to the IVF procedure (Gearhart & Coutifaris., 2010; Altmäe et al., 2011).
The demand for reproductive treatments has increased significantly in recent years, and there is a desire to develop more effective and less harmful protocols for patients. Despite the advances in reproductive medicine, the pregnancy rate remains close to 35% per treatment performed. In IVF/ICSI cycles, the expected results depend primarily on the effectiveness of the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), a routine procedure that precedes IVF/ICSI, in which exogenous gonadotropins are used to induce the development of multiple ovarian follicles (Macklon et al., 2006; Altmäe et al., 2011).
Protocols of COS involve the use of several gonadotropins, including recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH), which has a fundamental role in this process. Several studies have shown high variability in clinical outcomes between patients undergoing COS using r-FSH. This unpredictable variability in the ovarian response to gonadotropins, especially FSH, is one of the great challenges of assisted reproduction programs, with ovarian responses that can vary from poor to high, resulting in cancellations and complications such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Therefore, the development of tools that make it possible to predict the ovarian response to stimulation is fundamental for the success and safety of IVF/ICSI treatments (Coccia & Rizzello, 2008; Twigt et al., 2011).
Several parameters have been used in the evaluation of the ovarian reserve and as possible predictors of the ovarian response for patients who aim for reproductive therapy, such as the woman’s age, her serum level of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and her antral follicle count (AFC) by transvaginal ultrasound. In addition to these factors, polymorphisms in several genes have been studied to find genetic markers that can predict ovarian reserve and/or ovarian response, including polymorphisms in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) gene, located on chromosome 2 (de Castro et al., 2004; Loutradis et al., 2008; Morón & Ruiz, 2010; Lalioti, 2011; Boudjenah et al., 2012; Desai et al., 2013, Alviggi et al., 2018)
FSH acts through FSHR, which is present in the plasma membrane of granulosa cells. For some years, the occurrence of polymorphisms in FSHR has been studied and reported in infertile women. Some mutations, such as Ile160Thr, Ala189Val, and Asn191Ile, are associated with complete inhibition of FSHR activity. However, there are numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in the introns, coding region and promoter region of FSHR that are associated with receptor dysfunction, including the Ala307Thr polymorphism. The Ala307Thr polymorphism of the FSHR gene is located in exon 10, in the area that encodes its extracellular domain in the FSH binding area (Achrekar et al., 2009a; Overbeek & Lambalk, 2009; Karakaya et al., 2014). Considering that partial interference in FSHR function may result in variability in FSH action, a better understanding of FSHR polymorphisms would become a useful tool in predicting ovarian response in treatments involving assisted reproduction techniques. However, studies in different ethnic groups have observed conflicting results regarding a correlation between that polymorphisms and FSHR function (Klinkert et al., 2006; Mohiyiddeen et al., 2012; Polyzos et al., 2021; Conforti et al; 2022).
The observation that the polymorphism at position 307 in FSHR affects sensitivity to FSH is extremely relevant, as this region that mediates hormone action has already been shown to be crucial in in vitro events involving the production of cyclic AMP in response to FSH. Although several studies have been published regarding the effect of FSHR polymorphisms on ovarian response, most of those studies included a small number of patients and heterogeneous treatment protocols. Therefore, the available studies could not adequately estimate the real effect of SNPs on ovarian response (Perez-Mayorga et al., 2000; Behre et al., 2005; Achrekar et al., 2009b; La Marca et al., 2013; Trevisan et al., 2014; Alviggi et al., 2018; König et al., 2019; Song et al., 2019).
Considering that different protocols of ovarian stimulation have been used to induce growth in the number of follicles, thereby increasing the number of viable oocytes, and that the ovarian response to FSH depends on the FSHR genotype, identifying polymorphic variants of this receptor, such as at position 307, can be a useful tool to predict individual responses to COS with the use of gonadotropins and can help in the development of individualized protocols in IVF/ICSI programs.
The aim of the present study is to determine whether there is any association between the Ala307Thr polymorphism of the FSHR gene (rs6165) and ovarian response during COS in IVF/ICSI cycles. In addition, we aimed to determine whether there is an association between the Ala307Thr polymorphism of the FSHR gene, ovarian reserve and clinical outcomes in an IVF/ICSI cycle.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Subjects
A cross-sectional study was conducted between 2020 and 2022, with 450 Brazilian women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI treatment in the Human Reproduction Center (CRH) – Prof. Franco Jr. This center provided the data of the tests performed for IVF/ICSI treatment: genotypic markers that do not present additional risk in the treatment routine, since they are obtained through a peripheral blood sample already collected to perform routine tests such as the serum dosage of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). The AMH measurement and SNP genotyping were carried out at the Paulista Centre for Diagnosis, Research, and Training (CPDP). The AFC was performed by the mentioned centers.Inclusion criteriaThe inclusion criteria were age ≤37 years; regular menstrual cycle; normal karyotype; the observation of two ovaries on transvaginal ultrasound; and the absence of hydrosalpinx, previous ovarian surgeries, endometriosis, infection, or endocrinological disorders.The ovarian stimulation protocols that were used for patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles were restricted to two models, GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist protocols.DNA was extracted from a peripheral blood sample, and the FSHR Ala307Thr polymorphism (rs6165) was genotyped as described below. The results obtained were tested for correlations with the patient’s age, body mass index (BMI), level of HAM, CFA, total dose of rFSH, size of ovarian follicles, number of oocytes collected, and clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles (ongoing pregnancy rate).The subjects were dichotomized based on their genotype of the Ala307Thr polymorphism of the FSHR gene: homozygotes (Ala/Ala and Thr/Thr) and heterozygotes (Ala/Thr).

Ultrasound evaluation
Patients underwent transvaginal ultrasound during the follicular phase in cycles prior to IVF/ICSI. The ultrasound marker used in this study was the AFC. The total number of antral follicles measuring between 2 and 9 mm in both ovaries was used to evaluate these patients.

Enzymatic assay
Anti-Mullerian hormone measurements were performed in peripheral blood using the second-generation modified kit from Beckman Coulter Inc. (GenII ELISA kit/Beckman Coulter Inc., ref A73818) following the manufacturer’s instructions.To minimize the risks of error in this assay, the same operator performed all tests, and standard high- and low-level controls were included to certify the validity of the assay. Prior to this research, the average values of the intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation for this exam were calculated. The values obtained were 3.3% and 6.5%, respectively. The minimum detectable value of AMH was 0.01 ng/mL.

Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples of all subjects following the guidelines of the manufacturer of the QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (Qiagen) extraction kit. Polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes preselected through next-generation sequencing (NGS) were used for genotyping. SNP rs6165 of the FSHR gene was geno-typed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems). The mix for the real-time PCR was composed of 1 μL of genomic DNA (100 ng/μL), 5 μL of Master Mix Universal TaqMan (Applied Biosystems), 0.5 μL of probe and 3.5 μL of DNase-free water. The protocol for amplification had the following steps: denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 92 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. The thermal cycler used was the StepOnePlus Real Time PCR machine, which is part of the CPDP permanent material. PCR products were analyzed using TaqMan Genotyper v1.3 (ABI) software.

End-points
The primary endpoint was the total dose of gonadotropin (r-FSH) required during the first IVF/ICSI cycle.

Sample size
To calculate the sample size needed, the dose of r-FSH was used as the primary result. Sample size was calculated by performing a comparison between three means±standard deviations. A sample size of 84 subjects in each group had 80% power to detect an increase/decrease of 50% at a significance level of 0.05.

Statistical analysis
Categorical variables are expressed as percentages, and quantitative variables are expressed as mean and standard deviation. In cases where distribution with a nonnormal pattern was observed, the median and interquartile range were used. In situations where the variables presented distributions with extreme deviations, data transformation was performed on the variables that were included in the linear or logistic regression models. For the comparison of categorical variables, Fisher’s test was used to detect differences between two groups, and the chi-square test was used to detect differences between several groups. For the comparison of unpaired continuous variables, the parametric Student’s t test was used when comparing two groups and analysis of variance (ANOVA) when comparing three or more groups, applying the Bonferroni posttest for multiple comparisons.Linear and/or multiple logistic regression was used, depending on the nature of the outcome for comparison between groups. For all tests used, a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Contingency tables containing the combinations of all analyzed parameters were constructed to classify the ovarian reserve, thus establishing the specificity, sensitivity and agreement between the methods. Data analysis and construction of graphs presented in the results were performed using the StatsDirect version 2.7.9 program.

Ethical considerations
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients included in this trial. Authorization by the FAMERP Ethics Committee in Research (CAAE 60245216.0.0000.5415).

RESULTS
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
Genotype and allele distributions in the patients and the controls conformed to the expectations under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.

Demographic and ovarian stimulation cycle characteristics
Basic demographic characteristics, such as age, BMI (body mass index), and cause and duration of infertility, were not significantly different between women with different FSHR Ala307Thr (rs6165) genotypes (Table 1).

 

Table T1
Table 1. Main characteristics of infertile women, according to their FSHR gene Ala307Thr (rs6165) genotype.

 

Ovarian stimulation cycle characteristics
An association between the genotype of the Ala307Thr polymorphism and the dose of r-FSH was observed. Patients with the Ala/Ala genotype received a higher r-FSH dose than patients with the Ala/Thr (p=0.0002) or Thr/Thr (p=0.02) genotype (Table 2).

 

Table T2
Table 2. Ovarian stimulation cycle characteristics of the study population according to FSHR gene Ala307Thr (rs6165) genotype.

 

The distribution of the other characteristics of the ovarian stimulation cycle, such as the number of follicles on the hCG day, total number of oocytes retrieved, total number of metaphase II oocytes, and failed oocyte retrieval, did not differ by Ala307Thr (rs6165) genotype.

Clinical outcomes
Clinical outcomes such as implantation rate, pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and cumulative live birth rate were not significantly different according to Ala307Thr (rs6165) genotype (Table 3).

 

Table T3
Table 3. Clinical outcomes of the study population according to FSHR gene Ala307Thr (rs6165) genotype.

 

DISCUSSION
FSH is essential for follicular growth in females and spermatogenesis in males. It acts through its specific β-subunit, as its heterodimeric molecule also has an alpha-subunit that is common to other glycoprotein hormones (LH, hCG, TSH). FSH, when in the ovaries, binds to its cognate receptor FSHR, which belongs to the family of G-protein coupled receptors. The interaction with this receptor allows FSH to exert its activity in the female reproductive tract. Initially, folliculogenesis is promoted through estradiol production by the aromatase enzyme system, with granulosa cell growth and induction of LH receptors. In mid-cycle, the peaking of LH and FSH together induces essential actions leading to the rupture of the follicular wall during the ovulatory process. Finally, in the early follicular and proliferative phases, FSH recruits new antral follicles for the next cycle of folliculogenesis. Considering the fundamental role of FSH in the female reproductive tract, especially in folliculogenesis, pharmaceutical models of FSH are used in assisted reproduction treatments with the objective of multifollicular growth. Ovarian follicular activity and ovarian response to exogenous FSH appear to be influenced by specific gene expression of gonadotropins and their receptors (Yoshimura & Wallach, 1987; Yong et al., 1992; Palermo, 2007; Conforti et al., 2019).
Several activating or inactivating variants of FSHR have already been identified. The most clinically relevant inactivating variants are located in exons 7 and 10. The resulting phenotypes are varied, with the most typical clinical manifestations including elevated serum FSH levels, amenorrhea and infertility. The clinical manifestations of inactivating variants of the FSHR gene, unlike activating variants, occur only when present in homozygous or compound heterozygous forms (Orio et al., 2006; Desai et al., 2013). In 2000, Perez-Mayorga et al. (2000) demonstrated that the FSHR genotype plays a fundamental role in the physiological responsiveness of a given tissue to FSH stimulation.
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms located within or near the gene encoding FSHR have been shown to affect its sensitivity and expression to gonadotropins (Wunsch et al., 2005; Nakayama et al., 2006; Busch et al., 2016). Eight polymorphisms are present in the coding region, and only two of them have been extensively studied and confirmed to be related to clinically relevant phenotypes in assisted reproduction treatments. The polymorphisms present at positions p.Asn680Ser (rs6166) and p.Thr307Ala are related to the ovarian response to FSH stimulation. These two polymorphisms are present in exon 10 and are the predominant isoforms in several populations; therefore, they are the focus of most studies on this topic (Desai et al., 2013).
As FSH is essential in follicular growth, it is used for controlled ovarian stimulation during IVF/ICSI protocols. However, similar protocols of ovarian stimulation with exogenous FSH result in variable ovarian responses, from poor to too strong responses. Several parameters have been tested as markers to predict the ovarian response, such as age, hormonal biomarker (AMH) and ultrasound (AFC). However, the constant challenge for clinicians is to determine the optimal dose of FSH capable of generating a satisfactory and safe ovarian response in ART cycles (Kligman & Rosenwaks, 2001; Nardo et al., 2009; Desai et al., 2013). As a genetic biomarker, FSHR genotype could be useful to predict ovarian response and help clinicians to define the best protocol and dose of gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation. To the best of our knowledge, there are no data on the correlation between the rs6165 polymorphism and the total dose of gonadotropin required during ovarian stimulation.
There are studies supporting the role of the FSH rs6166 variant as a predictor of ovarian response to FSH stimulation. The Ser/Ser variant at position 680 of the FSHR gene was related to decreased ovarian reserve, a higher total dose of gonadotropin required for ovarian stimulation, and a lower number of oocytes collected in IVF/ICSI cycles (Perez-Mayorga et al., 2000; Sudo et al., 2002; Behre et al., 2005; Jun et al., 2006; Alviggi et al., 2016; Alviggi & Conforti, 2022). On the other hand, studies on the FSHR rs6165 SNP (p.Thr307Ala) and its relationship with the ovarian response to FSH stimulation are scarce (Conforti et al., 2022). According to our results, the FSHR (Thr307Ala, rs6165) polymorphism was associated with a statistically significant increase in the total dose of r-FSH required during ovarian stimulation.
Some studies suggest that carriers of the Thr/Thr variant at position 307 of the FSHR gene have greater activation of FSHR, so their duration of controlled ovarian stimulation would be shorter than that needed for carriers of Thr/Ala and Ala/Ala variants (Trevisan et al., 2014; Alviggi et al., 2018). In addition to these data, a meta-analysis and two subsequent studies showed that patients carrying the Ala/Ala variant of the FSHR gene (rs6165, p Thr307Ala) produced a smaller number of mature oocytes than those carrying the Thr/Ala and Thr/Thr variants (Achrekar et al., 2010; Yan et al., 2013; Motawi et al., 2017; Alviggi et al., 2018). In contrast to these data, the current study showed no significant difference in the characteristics of the IVF/ICSI cycle—stimulation time in days, total number of oocytes collected, or number of oocytes in metaphase II—between FSHR genotypes.
In a Chinese study (Yan et al., 2013) including 450 women who were categorized according to ovarian response (poor <5 oocytes retrieved; normal 5–14 oocytes retrieved; high >14 oocytes retrieved), the poor ovarian responders included significantly more Ala/Ala carriers than Thr/Thr or Thr/Ala carriers (p<0.001). This corroborates the findings of the present study, in which the Ala/Ala women required higher doses of r-FSH.
Studies related to the FSHR rs6165 polymorphism have provided limited information regarding clinical outcomes, although they have found no significant between the Ala/Ala, Thr/Thr and Thr/Ala genotypes (Conforti et al., 2022). These findings are consistent with the results of the present study, in which there was no association between FSHR genotype and implantation rate, pregnancy rate or live birth rate.
In this prospective study, we observed that the homozygous Ala/Ala genotype at position 307 of the FSHR gene is associated with the need for a higher dose of recombinant FSH and therefore probably leads to a decrease in the sensitivity of FSHR to gonadotropins. These data demonstrate that FSHR genotyping could be a useful tool in pharmacogenetics for the clinician to identify patients who, regardless of traditional ovarian reserve tests (e.g., AMH and AFC), may require a greater dose of FSH during ovarian stimulation in the ART cycle.
The availability of pharmacogenetics is important since anthropometric characteristics and ovarian reserve tests are not capable of predicting the ovarian response to stimulation with exogenous FSH. Some patients, instead of demonstrating satisfactory hormonal and ultrasonographic biomarkers of ovarian reserve or adequate ORPI (ovarian response prediction index), have poor ovarian response with a suboptimal number of oocytes obtained and consequently worse prognosis of their ART cycles (Oliveira et al., 2012; Alviggi et al., 2018; Conforti et al., 2019).

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the FSHR gene Ala/Ala genotype at amino acid position 307 was associated with the use of higher doses of r-FSH, suggesting that homozygosis of this allelic variant (Ala) provides lower sensitivity to r-FSH. Therefore, FSHR gene genotyping and the identification of Ala307Thr (rs6165) SNPs can be used as an additional tool in the individualization of ovarian stimulation protocols.

REFERENCES
Achrekar SK, Modi DN, Desai SK, Mangoli VS, Mangoli RV, Mahale SD. Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor polymorphism (Thr307Ala) is associated with variable ovarian response and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in Indian women. Fertil Steril. 2009a;91:432-9. PMID: 18321487 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.093

Achrekar SK, Modi DN, Desai SK, Mangoli VS, Mangoli RV, Mahale SD. Poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation is associated with FSH receptor polymorphism. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009b;18:509-15. PMID: 19400992 DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60127-7

Achrekar SK, Modi DN, Meherji PK, Patel ZM, Mahale SD. Follicle stimulating hormone receptor gene variants in women with primary and secondary amenorrhea. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:317-26. PMID: 20237833 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-010-9404-9

Altmäe S, Hovatta O, Stavreus-Evers A, Salumets A. Genetic predictors of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: where do we stand today? Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:813-28. PMID: 21862569 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr034

Alviggi C, Conforti A, Caprio F, Gizzo S, Noventa M, Strina I, Pagano T, De Rosa P, Carbone F, Colacurci N, De Placido G. In Estimated Good Prognosis Patients Could Unexpected “Hyporesponse” to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation be Related to Genetic Polymorphisms of FSH Receptor? Reprod Sci. 2016;23:1103-8. PMID: 26902430 DOI: 10.1177/1933719116630419

Alviggi C, Conforti A, Esteves SC, Vallone R, Venturella R, Staiano S, Castaldo E, Andersen CY, De Placido G. Understanding Ovarian Hypo-Response to Exogenous Gonadotropin in Ovarian Stimulation and Its New Proposed Marker-The Follicle-To-Oocyte (FOI) Index. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:589. PMID: 30386293 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00589

Alviggi C, Conforti A. Mild/moderate versus full stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:664-8. PMID: 35367011 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.022

Behre HM, Greb RR, Mempel A, Sonntag B, Kiesel L, Kaltwasser P, Seliger E, Röpke F, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E, Simoni M. Significance of a common single nucleotide polymorphism in exon 10 of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor gene for the ovarian response to FSH: a pharmacogenetic approach to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005;15:451-6. PMID: 15970792 DOI: 10.1097/01. fpc.0000167330.92786.5e

Boudjenah R, Molina-Gomes D, Torre A, Bergere M, Bailly M, Boitrelle F, Taieb S, Wainer R, Benahmed M, de Mazancourt P, Selva J, Vialard F. Genetic polymorphisms influence the ovarian response to rFSH stimulation in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization programs with ICSI. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38700. PMID: 22701696 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038700

Busch AS, Hagen CP, Almstrup K, Main KM, Juul A. Genetic variations altering FSH action affect circulating hormone levels as well as follicle growth in healthy peripubertal girls. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:897-904. PMID: 26905078 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew022

Coccia ME, Rizzello F. Ovarian reserve. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1127:27-30. PMID: 18443326 DOI: 10.1196/annals.1434.011

Conforti A, Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Bagnulo F, Peluso S, Carbone L, Di Rella F, De Placido G, Ubaldi FM, Huhtaniemi I, Alviggi C. Pharmacogenetics of FSH Action in the Female. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:398. PMID: 31293516 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00398

Conforti A, Esteves SC, Iorio GG, Carbone L, Alviggi C. Pharmacogenomic Approach in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation: Time to Take the Plunge? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2022;87:173-5. PMID: 35350015 DOI: 10.1159/000524265

de Castro F, Morón FJ, Montoro L, Galán JJ, Hernández DP, Padilla ES, Ramírez-Lorca R, Real LM, Ruiz A. Human controlled ovarian hyperstimulation outcome is a polygenic trait. Pharmacogenetics. 2004;14:285-93. PMID: 15115914 DOI: 10.1097/00008571-200405000-00003

Desai SS, Achrekar SK, Paranjape SR, Desai SK, Mangoli VS, Mahale SD. Association of allelic combinations of FSHR gene polymorphisms with ovarian response. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27:400-6. PMID: 23953588 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.007

Gearhart J, Coutifaris C. In vitro fertilization, the Nobel Prize, and human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8:12-5. PMID: 21211779 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.015

Karakaya C, Guzeloglu-Kayisli O, Hobbs RJ, Gerasimova T, Uyar A, Erdem M, Oktem M, Erdem A, Gumuslu S, Ercan D, Sakkas D, Comizzoli P, Seli E, Lalioti MD. Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) alternative skipping of exon 2 or 3 affects ovarian response to FSH. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20:630-43. PMID: 24670307 DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gau024

Kligman I, Rosenwaks Z. Differentiating clinical profiles: predicting good responders, poor responders, and hyperresponders. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:1185-90. PMID: 11730748 DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02893-x

Klinkert ER, te Velde ER, Weima S, van Zandvoort PM, Hanssen RG, Nilsson PR, de Jong FH, Looman CW, Broekmans FJ. FSH receptor genotype is associated with pregnancy but not with ovarian response in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:687-95. PMID: 17169182 DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60660-8

König TE, van der Lee J, Schats R, Lambalk CB. The relationship between FSH receptor polymorphism status and IVF cycle outcome: a retrospective observational study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39:231-40. PMID: 31279715 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.05.018

Lalioti MD. Impact of follicle stimulating hormone receptor variants in fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23:158-67. PMID: 21372710 DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283455288

La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Argento C, Grisendi V, Casarini L, Volpe A, Simoni M. Polymorphisms in gonadotropin and gonadotropin receptor genes as markers of ovarian reserve and response in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:970-8.e1. PMID: 23380184 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.086

Loutradis D, Patsoula E, Minas V, Koussidis GA, Antsaklis A, Michalas S, Makrigiannakis A. FSH receptor gene polymorphisms have a role for different ovarian response to stimulation in patients entering IVF/ICSI-ET programs. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23:177-84. PMID: 16758348 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-005-9015-z

Macklon NS, Stouffer RL, Giudice LC, Fauser BC. The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Endocr Rev. 2006;27:170-207. PMID: 16434510 DOI: 10.1210/er.2005- 0015

Mohiyiddeen L, Newman WG, McBurney H, Mulugeta B, Roberts SA, Nardo LG. Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene polymorphisms are not associated with ovarian reserve markers. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:677-81. PMID: 22265040 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.040

Morón FJ, Ruiz A. Pharmacogenetics of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: time to corroborate the clinical utility of FSH receptor genetic markers. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11:1613-8. PMID: 21121812 DOI: 10.2217/pgs.10.156

Motawi TMK, Rizk SM, Maurice NW, Maged AM, Raslan AN, Sawaf AH. The role of gene polymorphisms and AMH level in prediction of poor ovarian response in Egyptian women undergoing IVF procedure. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:1659-66. PMID: 28825151 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1013-4

Nakayama T, Kuroi N, Sano M, Tabara Y, Katsuya T, Ogihara T, Makita Y, Hata A, Yamada M, Takahashi N, Hirawa N, Umemura S, Miki T, Soma M. Mutation of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene 5’-untranslated region associated with female hypertension. Hypertension. 2006;48:512-8. PMID: 16864747 DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000233877.84343.d7

Nardo LG, Granne I, Stewart J; Policy & Practice Committee of the British Fertility Society. Medical adjuncts in IVF: evidence for clinical practice. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009;12:1-13. PMID: 19330607 DOI: 10.1080/14647270802692169

Oliveira JB, Baruffi RL, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Nascimento AM, Vagnini L, Ricci J, Cavagna M, Franco JG Jr. A new ovarian response prediction index (ORPI): implications for individualised controlled ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:94. PMID: 23171004 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-94

Orio F Jr, Ferrarini E, Cascella T, Dimida A, Palomba S, Gianetti E, Colao A, Agretti P, Vitti P, Lombardi G, Pinchera A, Tonacchera M. Genetic analysis of the follicle stimulating hormone receptor gene in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest. 2006;29:975-82. PMID: 17259794 DOI: 10.1007/BF03349210

Overbeek A, Lambalk N. Pharmacogenomics of ovulation induction: facilitating decisions on who, when and how to treat. Pharmacogenomics. 2009;10:1377-9. PMID: 19761360 DOI: 10.2217/pgs.09.110

Palermo R. Differential actions of FSH and LH during folliculogenesis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:326-37. PMID: 17854533 DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60347-1

Perez-Mayorga M, Gromoll J, Behre HM, Gassner C, Nieschlag E, Simoni M. Ovarian response to follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulation depends on the FSH receptor genotype. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:3365-9. PMID: 10999835 DOI: 10.1210/jcem.85.9.6789

Polyzos NP, Neves AR, Drakopoulos P, Spits C, Alvaro Mercadal B, Garcia S, Ma PQM, Le LH, Ho MT, Mertens J, Stoop D, Tournaye H, Vuong NL. The effect of polymorphisms in FSHR and FSHB genes on ovarian response: a prospective multicenter multinational study in Europe and Asia. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:1711-21. PMID: 33889959 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab068

Song D, Huang XL, Hong L, Yu JM, Zhang ZF, Zhang HQ, Sun ZG, Du J. Sequence variants in FSHR and CYP19A1 genes and the ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:749-57.e2. PMID: 31371045 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.017

Sudo S, Kudo M, Wada S, Sato O, Hsueh AJ, Fujimoto S. Genetic and functional analyses of polymorphisms in the human FSH receptor gene. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8:893-9. PMID: 12356937 DOI: 10.1093/molehr/8.10.893

Trevisan CM, Peluso C, Cordts EB, de Oliveira R, Christofolini DM, Barbosa CP, Bianco B. Ala307Thr and Asn680Ser polymorphisms of FSHR gene in human reproduction outcomes. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;34:1527-35. PMID: 25322982 DOI: 10.1159/000366356

Twigt JM, Hammiche F, Sinclair KD, Beckers NG, Visser JA, Lindemans J, de Jong FH, Laven JS, Steegers-Theunissen RP. Preconception folic acid use modulates estradiol and follicular responses to ovarian stimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:E322-9. PMID: 21123447 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2010-1282

Wunsch A, Ahda Y, Banaz-Yaşar F, Sonntag B, Nieschlag E, Simoni M, Gromoll J. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region influence the expression of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:446-53. PMID: 16084888 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.031

Yan Y, Gong Z, Zhang L, Li Y, Li X, Zhu L, Sun L. Association of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor polymorphisms with ovarian response in Chinese women: a prospective clinical study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78138. PMID: 24167601 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078138

Yong EL, Baird DT, Hillier SG. Mediation of gonadotrophin-stimulated growth and differentiation of human granulosa cells by adenosine-3’,5’-monophosphate: one molecule, two messages. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1992;37:51-8. PMID: 1330383 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1992.tb02283.x

Yoshimura Y, Wallach EE. Studies of the mechanism(s) of mammalian ovulation. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:22-34. PMID: 3539643